LG Electronics Inc. v. Hisense Electronics Manufacturing Company of America Corporation et al
LG Electronics Inc. |
Hisense International (HK) Co., Ltd., HISENSE USA CORPORATION, Hisense Electronics Manufacturing Company of America Corporation, Hisense Co., Ltd., Qingdao Hisense Electronics Co. Ltd., Hisense International (Hong Kong) America Investment Co., Ltd., Hisense International Co. Ltd., Hisense International HK Co., Ltd., Hisense International Hong Kong America Investment Co., Ltd., Hisense Electric Co., Ltd. and Hisense International America Holdings Co., Ltd. |
2:2019cv09474 |
November 4, 2019 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Charles F Eick |
S James Otero |
Patent |
35 U.S.C. § 271 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 6, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 27 ORDER RE: WAIVER OF SERVICE AND EXTENSION OF TIME TO ALL DEFENDANTS TO RESPOND TOCOMPLAINT TO FEBRUARY 12, 2020 #25 by Judge S. James Otero (lc) |
Filing 26 ORDER RE: WAIVER OF SERVICE AND ORDER EXTENSION OF TIME TO ALL DEFENDANTS TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT TO FEBRUARY 12, 2020 #25 by Judge S. James Otero (lc) |
Filing 25 Joint STIPULATION to Waive Service Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 , Joint STIPULATION for Extension of Time to File Answer to February 12, 2020 filed by plaintiff LG Electronics Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Chandler, Theodore) |
Filing 24 INITIAL STANDING ORDER upon filing of the complaint by Judge S. James Otero. (vcr) |
Filing 23 ORDER TO TRANSFER CASE TO THE PATENT PILOT PROGRAM by Judge Percy Anderson. Case transferred from Judge Percy Anderson to Judge S. James Otero for all further proceedings. Case number now reads 2:19-cv-09474 SJO (Ex). (esa) |
Filing 22 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 as to defendant Hisense International HK Co., Ltd. (mrgo) |
Filing 21 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 as to defendant Hisense International Hong Kong America Investment Co., Ltd. (mrgo) |
Filing 20 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 as to defendant Hisense USA Corporation. (mrgo) |
Filing 19 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 as to defendant Hisense Electronics Manufacturing Company of America Corporation. (mrgo) |
Filing 18 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 as to defendant Hisense International Co. Ltd. (mrgo) |
Filing 17 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 as to defendant Qingdao Hisense Electronics Co. Ltd. (mrgo) |
Filing 16 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 as to defendant Hisense Co., Ltd. (mrgo) |
Filing 15 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by plaintiff LG Electronics Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Summons Request, #2 Summons Request, #3 Summons Request, #4 Summons Request, #5 Summons Request, #6 Summons Request)(Kang, Peter) |
Filing 14 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCIES in Request to Issue Summons RE: Summons Request #5 , Summons Request #10 , Summons Request #9 , Summons Request #8 , Summons Request #6 , Summons Request #4 , Summons Request #7 . The following error(s) was found: The caption of the summons must match the caption of the complaint verbatim. If the caption is too large to fit in the space provided, enter the name of the first party and then write see attached.Next, attach a face page of the complaint or a second page addendum to the Summons. Remove "et al " from the Summons caption. The summons cannot be issued until this defect has been corrected. Please correct the defect and re-file your request. (ghap) |
Filing 13 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (ghap) |
Filing 12 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Percy Anderson and Magistrate Judge Charles F. Eick. (ghap) |
Filing 11 REPORT ON THE FILING OF AN ACTION Regarding a Patent or a Trademark (Initial Notification) filed by LG Electronics Inc.. (Kang, Peter) |
Filing 10 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by plaintiff LG Electronics Inc.. (Kang, Peter) |
Filing 9 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by plaintiff LG Electronics Inc.. (Kang, Peter) |
Filing 8 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by plaintiff LG Electronics Inc.. (Kang, Peter) |
Filing 7 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by plaintiff LG Electronics Inc.. (Kang, Peter) |
Filing 6 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Plaintiff LG Electronics Inc.. (Kang, Peter) |
Filing 5 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Plaintiff LG Electronics Inc.. (Kang, Peter) |
Filing 4 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by plaintiff LG Electronics Inc.. (Kang, Peter) |
Filing 3 CERTIFICATION AND NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff LG Electronics Inc., identifying LG Corporation. (Kang, Peter) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff LG Electronics Inc.. (Kang, Peter) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: 0973-24721304 - Fee: $400, filed by plaintiff LG Electronics Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3, #4 Exhibit 4) (Attorney Peter H Kang added to party LG Electronics Inc.(pty:pla))(Kang, Peter) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.