Pilot, Inc. v. Aukey Technology Co, Ltd. et al
| Pilot, Inc. |
| Aukey Technology Co, Ltd. and Shenzhen Aukey E-Business Co., Ltd. |
| 2:2019cv09486 |
| November 4, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Michael W Fitzgerald |
| Suzanne H Segal |
| Patent |
| 35 U.S.C. § 271 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 11, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 23
ORDER ON SECOND AGREED MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT #22 by Judge Michael W. Fitzgerald. Defendants Aukey Technology Co, Ltd. and Shenzhen Aukey E-Business Co., Ltd.'s new deadline to respond to Plaintiff's Complaint is January 21, 2020. (iv)
|
| Filing 22 Second STIPULATION for Extension of Time to File Answer to January 21, 2020 re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Plaintiff Pilot, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Holohan, Matthew) |
|
Filing 21
ORDER by Judge Michael W. Fitzgerald: Granting Application of Non-Resident Attorney Aaron P. Bradford to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Plaintiff Pilot, Inc., designating Matthew C. Holohan as local counsel #18 . (iv)
|
| Filing 20 RESPONSE BY THE COURT TO NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES IN ELECTRONICALLY FILED DOCUMENTS RE: Application to Appear Pro Hac Vice (Bradford) #18 by Judge Michael W. Fitzgerald. The document is accepted as filed. (iv) |
| Filing 19 NOTICE of Deficiency in Electronically Filed Pro Hac Vice Application RE: APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Aaron P. Bradford to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Plaintiff Pilot, Inc. (Pro Hac Vice Fee - $400 Fee Paid, Receipt No. 0973-24889687) #18 . The following error(s) was/were found: Local Rule 83-2.1.3.4 Local counsel does not maintain an office within the District. (lt) |
| Filing 18 APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Aaron P. Bradford to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Plaintiff Pilot, Inc. (Pro Hac Vice Fee - $400 Fee Paid, Receipt No. 0973-24889687) filed by Plaintiff Pilot, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Holohan, Matthew) |
|
Filing 17
ORDER ON AGREED MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT #16 by Judge Michael W. Fitzgerald. Defendants Aukey's new deadline to respond to Plaintiff's Complaint is December 20, 2019. (iv)
|
| Filing 16 STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to All Defendants, filed by Defendant Aukey Technology Co, Ltd.. (Attachments: #1 Declaration Declaration of Philip C. Swain in support of agreed motion for extension of time, #2 Exhibit Exhibit A to Swain declaration)(Swain, Philip) |
| Filing 15 NOTICE of Appearance filed by attorney Philip C Swain on behalf of Defendants Aukey Technology Co, Ltd., Shenzhen Aukey E-Business Co., Ltd. (Attorney Philip C Swain added to party Aukey Technology Co, Ltd.(pty:dft), Attorney Philip C Swain added to party Shenzhen Aukey E-Business Co., Ltd.(pty:dft))(Swain, Philip) |
| Filing 14 RESPONSE filed by Pro Hac Vice attorney Aaron P. Bradford on behalf of Plaintiff RE: Notice of Filing Fee Due. PHV fee N/A. Certificates of good standing have been ordered and Mr. Bradford will complete his pro hac admission application and submit the certificates once they have been received from the Colorado and Arizona Courts. (lt) Modified on 11/12/2019 (lt). |
| Filing 13 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Pilot, Inc., upon Defendant Shenzhen Aukey E-Business Co., Ltd. served on 11/7/2019, answer due 11/29/2019. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Ming Li, Employee-Authorized to Accept in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by personal service.Original Summons NOT returned. (Holohan, Matthew) |
| Filing 12 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Pilot, Inc., upon Defendant Aukey Technology Co, Ltd. served on 11/7/2019, answer due 11/29/2019. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Ming Li, Employee-Authorized to Accept in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by personal service.Original Summons NOT returned. (Holohan, Matthew) |
| Filing 11 NOTICE OF PRO HAC VICE APPLICATION DUE for Non-Resident Attorney Aaron P Bradford. A document recently filed in this case lists you as an out-of-state attorney of record. However, the Court has not been able to locate any record that you are admitted to the Bar of this Court, and you have not filed an application to appear Pro Hac Vice in this case. Accordingly, within 5 business days of the date of this notice, you must either (1) have your local counsel file an application to appear Pro Hac Vice (Form G-64) and pay the applicable fee, or (2) complete the next section of this form and return it to the court at cacd_attyadm@cacd.uscourts.gov. You have been removed as counsel of record from the docket in this case, and you will not be added back to the docket until your Pro Hac Vice status has been resolved. (car) |
| Filing 10 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 as to Defendant Shenzhen Aukey E-Business Co., Ltd. (car) |
| Filing 9 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 as to Defendant Aukey Technology Co, Ltd. (car) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (car) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Michael W. Fitzgerald and Magistrate Judge Suzanne H. Segal. (car) |
| Filing 6 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Plaintiff Pilot, Inc.. (Holohan, Matthew) |
| Filing 5 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Plaintiff Pilot, Inc.. (Holohan, Matthew) |
| Filing 4 Certification and NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Pilot, Inc., identifying Pilot Holdings, Inc.. (Holohan, Matthew) |
| Filing 3 REPORT ON THE FILING OF AN ACTION Regarding a Patent or a Trademark (Initial Notification) filed by Pilot, Inc.. (Holohan, Matthew) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Pilot, Inc.. (Holohan, Matthew) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: 0973-24724465 - Fee: $400, filed by Plaintiff Pilot, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - US Pat. 9,525,297, #2 Exhibit B - US Pat. 10,046,653, #3 Exhibit C - Online Prod. Descriptions, #4 Exhibit D - Tacklife T6 User Manual, #5 Exhibit E - US Pat. 9,525,297 Pros History, #6 Exhibit F - US Pat. 10,046,653 Pros History) (Attorney Matthew Christian Holohan added to party Pilot, Inc.(pty:pla))(Holohan, Matthew) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
