Robert S. Whitmore v. The Cornerstone Bank
Robert S Whitmore |
The Cornerstone Bank and Cornerstone Bank |
Dorothy Lee Bitter |
2:2019cv09537 |
November 6, 2019 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Bankruptcy Withdrawal |
28 U.S.C. ยง 0157 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 7, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 NOTICE RE INTRA-DISTRICT TRANSFER by Clerk of Court due to clerical error. Case is transferred to the Eastern Division. Case has been reassigned to Judge George H. Wu for all further proceedings. New Case Number 5:19-cv-02144 GW. (esa) |
Filing 5 REQUEST FOR JUDICIAL NOTICE filed by Defendant The Cornerstone Bank. (Burch, Carleton) |
Filing 4 DECLARATION of Carleton R. Burch re Motion to Withdraw Bankruptcy Reference (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Defendant The Cornerstone Bank. (Burch, Carleton) |
Filing 3 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant The Cornerstone Bank, (Burch, Carleton) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendant The Cornerstone Bank. (Burch, Carleton) |
Filing 1 MOTION to Withdraw Reference of Adversary Proceeding No. 6:19-ap-01124-SY to the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for Case No. 6:18-BK-18322-SY Receipt No: 0973-24736475 - Fee: $181, filed by Defendant The Cornerstone Bank. (Attorney Carleton R Burch added to party The Cornerstone Bank(pty:dft))(Burch, Carleton) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.