5105 Harvard, LLC v. Rafael Velasquez et al
| 5105 Harvard, LLC |
| Adys Lopez, Rafael Velasquez and Does 1 to 10 |
| 2:2019cv09563 |
| November 7, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Western Division - Los Angeles Office |
| Michael R Wilner |
| Otis D Wright |
| Rent Lease & Ejectment |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1443 (1) Notice of Removal - Rent, Lease & Ejectment |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 16, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 12 Receipt of Remand by Los Angeles County Superior Court on 11/19/19 (lc) |
| Filing 11 TRANSMITTAL of documents to Los Angeles County Superior Court. A certified copy of the order of remand and a copy of the docket sheet from this court was sent to Los Angeles County Superior Court, No.19STU09654 (lc) |
| Filing 10 NOTICE OF CLERICAL ERROR: Due to clerical error Re: Letter of Transmittal - Remand to Superior Court (CV-103) - optional html form #9 Incorrect pdf of remand order attached instead of transmittal letter which will be docket forthwith. (lc) |
| Filing 9 TRANSMITTAL of documents to Los Angeles County Superior Court. A certified copy of the order of remand and a copy of the docket sheet from this court was sent to Los Angeles County Superior Court, No. 19STU09654 (lc) |
Filing 8
ORDER REMANDING CASE TO STATE COURT by Judge Otis D. Wright, II: Case remanded to Los Angeles Superior Court, Case number 19STU09654 Case Terminated. Made JS-6 (lc)
|
|
Filing 7
ORDER DENYING #3 REQUEST to Proceed in Forma Pauperis. Case is remanded to state court by Judge Otis D. Wright, II. (lc)
|
|
Filing 6
MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS by Judge Otis D Wright, II: This action has been assigned to the calendar of Judge Otis D. Wright II. Counsel are STRONGLY encouraged to review the Central Districts website for additional information. (SEE DOCUMENT FOR SPECIFIC FILING REQUIREMENTS AND INFORMATION).The parties may consent to proceed before a Magistrate Judge appearing on the voluntary consent list. PLEASE refer to Local Rule 79-5 for the submission of CIVIL ONLY SEALED DOCUMENTS. CRIMINAL SEALED DOCUMENTS will remain the same. all proposed sealed documents must be submitted via e-mail to the Judges Chambers email address, EXCLUDING those submitted by pro se parties and IN CAMERA filings, which shall continue to comply with Local Rule 79-5.1. Please refer to the Judges procedures and schedules for detailed instructions for submission of sealed documents. (lc)
|
| RECOMMENDATION issued by Magistrate Judge Michael R. Wilner. Proposed Order forwarded to the District Judge for approval. Re REQUEST to Proceed In Forma Pauperis, Declaration in Support #3 . (vm) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (esa) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Otis D. Wright, II and Magistrate Judge Michael R. Wilner. (esa) |
| Filing 3 REQUEST to Proceed In Forma Pauperis, Declaration in Support filed by defendant Rafael Velasquez. (esa) |
| Filing 2 CERTIFICATION AND NOTICE OF INTERESTED PARTIES filed by defendant Rafael Velasquez. (esa) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Superior Court of California Los Angeles County, case number 19STU09654 with copies of summons and complaint. Case assigned to Judge Otis D. Wright, II, Discovery to Magistrate Judge Michael R. Wilner, filed by defendant Rafael Velasquez. (Attachments: #1 CV-71) (esa) (Main Document 1 replaced on 11/14/2019) (ghap). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
