Eric Davis v. Chaplain John et al
Eric Davis |
Chaplain John |
2:2019cv09592 |
November 7, 2019 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Charles F Eick |
Consuelo B Marshall |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 18, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 9 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint #1 as to Defendant. (sp) |
Filing 8 ORDER by Magistrate Judge Charles F. Eick. The U.S. Marshal has been ordered to serve the Summons and Complaint as indicated on the Order Directing Service of Process by the Marshal. It is Further Ordered that Plaintiff must serve upon Defendants or, if appearance has been entered by counsel, upon their attorneys, a copy of every future pleading or other document submitted for consideration by the Court. (sp) |
Filing 7 ORDER Directing Service of Process by the U.S. Marshal by Magistrate Judge Charles F. Eick. (sp) |
Filing 6 FINANCIAL ENTRY: Received $42.05 subsequent payment from plaintiff Eric Davis on 12/13/19, receipt number LA199197, re: Order on Request for Leave to Proceed without Prepayment of Filing Fees (CV60P),, #4 . THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. TEXT ONLY ENTRY. (jo) |
Filing 5 FINANCIAL ENTRY: Received $9.90 initial partial filing fee from plaintiff Eric Davis on 12/10/19, receipt number LA199197, re: Order on Request for Leave to Proceed without Prepayment of Filing Fees (CV60P),, #4 . THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. TEXT ONLY ENTRY. (jo) |
Filing 4 ORDER Re Request to Proceed Without Prepayment of Filing Fees by Magistrate Judge Charles F. Eick: granting #2 REQUEST for Leave to Proceed without Prepayment of Filing Fee. It is Further Ordered that, in accordance with 28 U.S.C. 1915, the prisoner-plaintiff owes the Court the total filing fee of $350.00. An initial partial filing fee of $51.95 must be paid within 30 days of the date this order is filed. Failure to remit the initial partial filing fee may result in dismissal of the case. Thereafter, monthly payments shall be forwarded to the Court in accordance with 28 U.S.C. 1915(b)(2). (sp) |
Filing 3 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Consuelo B. Marshall and referred to Magistrate Judge Charles F. Eick. (jtil) |
Filing 2 REQUEST to Proceed Without Prepayment of Filing Fees with Declaration in Support filed by Plaintiff Eric Davis. (jtil) |
Filing 1 CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT filed by Plaintiff Eric Davis against Defendants Chaplain John pursuant to 42 USC 1983. Case assigned to Judge Consuelo B. Marshall and referred to Magistrate Judge Charles F. Eick. (jtil) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Eric Davis v. Chaplain John et al | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Chaplain John | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Eric Davis | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.