Claudia Esther Bojorquez v. Andrew Saul
Claudia Esther Bojorquez |
Commissioner of Soci Andrew Saul and Andrew Saul |
2:2019cv09649 |
November 8, 2019 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Karen E Scott |
Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
42 U.S.C. ยง 405 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 29, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 14 NOTICE TO COUNSEL: ALL PARTIES having consented to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge, this case has been reassigned to Magistrate Judge Karen E. Scott for all further proceedings. Please use the case number 2:19-cv-09649 KES on all documents subsequently filed to ensure the proper routing of all filings. RE: Consent to Proceed before U S Magistrate Judge (non-AUSA) - Non-Final #12 , Consent to Proceed before U S Magistrate Judge (AUSA filers only) - Non-Final #13 . THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. TEXT ONLY ENTRY. (esa) |
Filing 13 CONSENT TO PROCEED before Magistrate Judge, in accordance with Title 28 Section 636(c) and F.R.CIV.P 73(b), filed by Defendant Andrew Saul. (Attorney Paul H Sachelari added to party Andrew Saul(pty:dft))(Sachelari, Paul) |
Filing 12 CONSENT TO PROCEED before Magistrate Judge, in accordance with Title 28 Section 636(c) and F.R.CIV.P 73(b), filed by Plaintiff Claudia Esther Bojorquez. (McCabe, Patricia) |
Filing 11 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Claudia Esther Bojorquez, upon Defendant Andrew Saul served on 11/25/2019, answer due 1/24/2020. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon the United States Attorneys Office by delivering a copy to Genevieve Ortega. Service was executed in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Due diligence declaration NOT attached. Registered or certified mail return receipt attached. Original Summons NOT returned. (Attachments: #1 Proof of Service on Andrew Saul, Commissioner of Social Security, #2 Proof of Service on Office of Regional Chief Counsel, Region IX, Social Security Administration, #3 Proof of Service on U.S. Attorney General, U.S. Department of Justice)(McCabe, Patricia) |
Filing 10 SUPPLEMENTAL ORDER RE PROCEDURES IN SOCIAL SECURITY APPEAL by Magistrate Judge Karen E. Scott. (jdo) |
Filing 9 ORDER RE PROCEDURES IN SOCIAL SECURITY APPEAL (JOINT SUBMISSION FORMAT) by Magistrate Judge Karen E. Scott. (jdo) |
Filing 8 60 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant Andrew Saul. (jdo) |
Filing 7 ORDER by Magistrate Judge Karen E. Scott: granting #2 REQUEST to Proceed in Forma Pauperis with Declaration in Support (CV-60). (jdo) |
Filing 6 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Jesus G. Bernal and referred to Magistrate Judge Karen E. Scott. (lh) |
Filing 5 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Claudia Esther Bojorquez. (McCabe, Patricia) |
Filing 4 CERTIFICATION and NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Claudia Esther Bojorquez, identifying Social Security Administration. (McCabe, Patricia) |
Filing 3 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Claudia Esther Bojorquez. (McCabe, Patricia) |
Filing 2 REQUEST to Proceed In Forma Pauperis, Declaration in Support filed by Plaintiff Claudia Esther Bojorquez. (McCabe, Patricia) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT with In Forma Pauperis request, filed by Plaintiff Claudia Esther Bojorquez. (Attorney Patricia L McCabe added to party Claudia Esther Bojorquez(pty:pla))(McCabe, Patricia) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.