Brian Whitaker v. Steven J. Gerschultz et al
| Brian Whitaker |
| Does 1-10, Steven J. Gerschultz, Kalen R. Franklin and Christina Peng Gerschultz |
| 2:2019cv09660 |
| November 11, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| John E McDermott |
| Fernando M Olguin |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 20, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 12 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Brian Whitaker, upon Defendant Steven J. Gerschultz served on 12/1/2019, answer due 1/22/2020. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Ruts Ortiz - Co Occupant in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by substituted service at home address and by also mailing a copy.Original Summons returned. (Handy, Russell) |
| Filing 11 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Brian Whitaker, upon Defendant Kalen R. Franklin served on 12/5/2019, answer due 1/22/2020. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Nick limon the business crew trainer in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by substituted service at business address and by also mailing a copy.Original Summons returned. (Handy, Russell) |
| Filing 10 First STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to Kalen R. Franklin answer now due 1/22/2020; Christina Peng Gerschultz answer now due 1/22/2020; Steven J. Gerschultz answer now due 1/22/2020, filed by Defendants Kalen R. Franklin; Christina Peng Gerschultz; Steven J. Gerschultz.(Attorney David E Karlin added to party Kalen R. Franklin(pty:dft), Attorney David E Karlin added to party Christina Peng Gerschultz(pty:dft), Attorney David E Karlin added to party Steven J. Gerschultz(pty:dft))(Karlin, David) |
| Filing 9 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Brian Whitaker, upon Defendant Christina Peng Gerschultz served on 12/1/2019, answer due 12/23/2019. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Ruts Ortiz in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by substituted service at home address and by also mailing a copy.Original Summons returned. (Handy, Russell) |
| Filing 8 TEXT ONLY ENTRY by Chambers of Judge Fernando M. Olguin. This matter has been assigned to District Judge Fernando M. Olguin. The Court refers counsel to the Court's Initial Standing Order found on the Court's Website under Judge Olguin's Procedures and Schedules. Please read this Order carefully. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (cw) TEXT ONLY ENTRY |
| Filing 7 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendants Kalen R. Franklin, Christina Peng Gerschultz, Steven J. Gerschultz. (lh) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (lh) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Fernando M. Olguin and Magistrate Judge John E. McDermott. (lh) |
| Filing 4 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by plaintiff Brian Whitaker. (Handy, Russell) |
| Filing 3 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Brian Whitaker, (Handy, Russell) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Brian Whitaker. (Handy, Russell) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: 0973-24759307 - Fee: $400, filed by plaintiff Brian Whitaker. (Attorney Russell C Handy added to party Brian Whitaker(pty:pla))(Handy, Russell) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
