Devin M. Harmon v. U.S.D.C. Central District of California
Devin M. Harmon |
U.S.D.C. Central District of California |
2:2019cv09680 |
November 12, 2019 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Alicia G Rosenberg |
Josephine L Staton |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1651 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 27, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 10 MOTION to Invoke Immediate Danger and Request Immediate Cause for Review filed by Petitioner Devin M. Harmon. (hr) |
Filing 9 PETITION for Permission for Appearance Before a Magistrate filed by Petitioner Devin M. Harmon. (hr) |
Filing 8 PETITION of Immediate Cause Pursuant to Equal Protection of the Laws, Invoking Collateral and Equitable Estoppel filed by Petitioner Devin M. Harmon. (hr) |
Filing 7 EMERGENCY OBJECTION Fed.R.Civ.P. 46, Imminent Danger, Judicial Error In Re Rule 60(d), MOTION to Set Aside Judgment In Re CV.07.398, Re: Judgment #4 filed by Petitioner Devin M. Harmon. (hr) |
Filing 6 Mail Returned addressed to Devin M. Harmon re Notice of Reference to US Magistrate Judge #2 . Name and number do not correspond. (hr) |
Filing 5 ORDER DENYING CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY by Judge Josephine L. Staton (car) |
Filing 4 JUDGMENT by Judge Josephine L. Staton, Related to: Opinion and Order on Petition for Writ of Coram Nobis #3 . IT IS ADJUDGED that the Petition For Writ of Coram Nobis is summarily dismissed. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (hr) |
Filing 3 OPINION AND ORDER ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF ERROR CORAM NOBIS by Judge Josephine L. Staton. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Judgment be entered summarily dismissing the Petition for Writ of Coram Nobis. (see document for further details) (hr) |
RECOMMENDATION issued by Magistrate Judge Alicia G. Rosenberg. Re Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (2254) #1 . Proposed Order forwarded to the District Judge for approval. (kl) |
Filing 2 NOTICE OF REFERENCE to a U.S. Magistrate Judge. This case has been assigned to the calendar of the Honorable District Judge Josephine L. Staton and referred to Magistrate Judge Alicia G. Rosenberg, who is authorized to consider preliminary matters and conduct all further hearings as may be appropriate or necessary. Pursuant to Local Rule 83-2.4, the Court must be notified within five (5) days of any address change. See notice for additional details. (Attachments: #1 CV-111) (lh) |
Filing 1 PETITION FOR WRIT OF ERROR CORAM NOBIS. Case assigned to Judge Josephine L. Staton and referred to Magistrate Judge Alicia G. Rosenberg. (Filing Fee $ 5 Due), filed by Petitioner Devin M. Harmon. (lh) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Devin M. Harmon v. U.S.D.C. Central District of California | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner: Devin M. Harmon | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Respondent: U.S.D.C. Central District of California | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.