Luis Lomeli et al v. Universal Protection Service, LP et al
Luis Lomeli |
Universal Protection Service, LP, Salvador Villegas and Does 1-10, inclusive |
2:2019cv09754 |
November 13, 2019 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Virginia A Phillips |
Alicia G Rosenberg |
Labor: Other |
28 U.S.C. § 1441 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 10, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 17 TRANSMITTAL of documents to Los Angeles County Superior Cour. A certified copy of the order of remand and a copy of the docket sheet from this court was sent to Los Angeles County Superior Court, 111 N. Hill St., Los Angeles, CA 90012. (bm) |
Filing 16 ORDER GRANTING Plaintiff's Motion to Remand (Dkt.11) by Judge Virginia A. Phillips: granting #11 MOTION to Remand Case to State Court: The Court finds Plaintiff's claims not preempted by federal law, and declines to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over Plaintiff's claims. The Court therefore GRANTS Plaintiffs Motion to Remand the action to the Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles. (see document for further details) MD JS-6. Case Terminated. (bm) |
Filing 15 SCHEDULING NOTICE (IN CHAMBERS): COUNSEL OF RECORD ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED, on the Court's own motion, the hearing on Plaintiff's Motion to Remand to State Court, and for costs and fees #11 , set for 1/14/20, is hereby TAKEN OFF CALENDAR. NO appearance by counsel will be necessary. This matter is appropriate for resolution without hearing pursuant to See Fed. R. Civ. P. 78; L.R. 7-15, and will stand submitted on the papers timely filed. by Judge Virginia A. Phillips THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (bh) TEXT ONLY ENTRY |
Filing 14 SCHEDULING NOTICE (IN CHAMBERS): COUNSEL OF RECORD ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED, on the Court's own motion, hearing on Plaintiff's MOTION to Remand Case to Los Angeles Superior Court #11 , set 1/13/2020 is CONTINUED to 1/14/2020 at 02:00 PM before Chief Judge Virginia A. Phillips. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (bh) TEXT ONLY ENTRY |
Filing 13 REPLY in support of NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Remand Case to Los Angeles Superior Court #11 filed by Plaintiff Luis Lomeli. (Cherne, Jonathon) |
Filing 12 MEMORANDUM in Opposition to NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Remand Case to Los Angeles Superior Court #11 filed by Defendants Universal Protection Service, LP, Salvador Villegas. (Smith, Alexandra) |
Filing 11 NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Remand Case to Los Angeles Superior Court filed by Plaintiff Luis Lomeli. Motion set for hearing on 1/13/2020 at 02:00 PM before Judge Virginia A. Phillips. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum, #2 Declaration Jonathon Cherne Declaration, #3 Exhibit Exh 1 to Cherne Decl, #4 Proposed Order) (Cherne, Jonathon) |
Filing 10 ORDER SETTING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Judge Virginia A. Phillips. Scheduling Conference set for 2/10/2020 at 01:30 PM before Judge Virginia A. Phillips. (bh) |
Filing 9 STANDING ORDER by Judge Virginia A. Phillips. (bh) |
Filing 8 ORDER RETURNING CASE FOR REASSIGNMENT by Judge Christina A. Snyder. ORDER case returned to the Clerk for random reassignment pursuant to General Order 19-03. Case randomly reassigned from Judge Christina A. Snyder to Judge Virginia A. Phillips for all further proceedings. The case number will now reflect the initials of the transferee Judge 2:19-cv-9754 VAP (AGRx). (mrgo) |
Filing 7 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (ghap) |
Filing 6 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Christina A. Snyder and Magistrate Judge Alicia G. Rosenberg. (ghap) |
CONFORMED FILED COPY OF ANSWER to Complaint - (Discovery) filed by Defendants Universal Protection Service, LP, Salvador Villegas. (FILED IN STATE COURT ON 11/7/2019 SUBMITTED ATTACHED EXHIBIT C)(ghap) |
CONFORMED FILED COPY OF COMPLAINT against Defendants Does 1-10, Universal Protection Service, LP, Salvador Villegas. Jury Demanded., filed by plaintiff Luis Lomeli. (FILED IN STATE COURT ON 10/3/2019 SUBMITTED ATTACHED EXHIBIT A) (ghap) |
Filing 5 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE filed by Defendants Universal Protection Service, LP, Salvador Villegas, re Civil Cover Sheet (CV-71) #2 , Joinder (non-motion) #4 , Certificate/Notice of Interested Parties #3 , Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening),,, #1 served on 11/13/2019. (Braxton, Janine) |
Filing 4 JOINDER filed by Defendant Salvador Villegas joining in Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening),,, #1 . (Braxton, Janine) |
Filing 3 DEFENDANT'S NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Universal Protection Service, LP, identifying n/a. (Braxton, Janine) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendant Universal Protection Service, LP. (Braxton, Janine) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL Receipt No: 0973-24778448 - Fee: $400, filed by Defendant Universal Protection Service, LP, Salvador Villegas. (Attachments: #1 Declaration Declaration of Janine M. Braxton in Support of Notice of Removal of Action, #2 Exhibit Exhibit A to Declaration of Janine M. Braxton in Support of Notice of Removal of Action, #3 Exhibit Exhibit B to Declaration of Janine M. Braxton in Support of Notice of Removal of Action, #4 Exhibit Exhibit C to Declaration of Janine M. Braxton in Support of Notice of Removal of Action, #5 Declaration Declaration of Michelle Williams in Support of Notice of Removal of Action, #6 Exhibit Exhibit A to Declaration of Michelle Williams in Support of Notice of Removal of Action) (Attorney Janine M Braxton added to party Universal Protection Service, LP(pty:dft))(Braxton, Janine) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.