Brian Whitaker v. 4600 E2 LLC et al
| Brian Whitaker |
| Does 1-10, Belmont-Arch, Inc. and 4600 E2 LLC |
| 2:2019cv09791 |
| November 15, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Gail J Standish |
| John F Walter |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 6, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 16 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Brian Whitaker, upon Defendant 4600 E2 LLC served on 11/25/2019, answer due 12/16/2019. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Agent for Service of Process: JONATHAN S FORSTER in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by personal service.Original Summons returned. (Handy, Russell) |
| Filing 15 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Brian Whitaker, upon Defendant Belmont-Arch, Inc. served on 12/7/2019, answer due 12/28/2019. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Sandra Welsh- Receptionist in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by substituted service at business address and by also mailing a copy.Original Summons returned. (Handy, Russell) |
| Filing 14 NOTICE filed by Defendants 4600 E2 LLC, Belmont-Arch, Inc.. of Interested Parties (Gabriel, Gavril) |
| Filing 13 ANSWER to Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Defendants 4600 E2 LLC, Belmont-Arch, Inc..(Gabriel, Gavril) |
| Filing 12 Qualified Opposition Docket Entry 1 (Complaint), 22 re: First APPLICATION to Stay Case and Early Mediation re ADA Disability Access Litigation, #9 filed by Plaintiff Brian Whitaker. (Miller, Bryan) |
| Filing 11 NOTICE of Appearance filed by attorney Bryan Barnet Miller on behalf of Plaintiff Brian Whitaker (Attorney Bryan Barnet Miller added to party Brian Whitaker(pty:pla))(Miller, Bryan) |
Filing 10
ORDER by Judge John F. Walter: Denying #9 APPLICATION to Stay Case re Early Mediation ADA Disability Access Litigation. (iv)
|
| Filing 9 First APPLICATION to Stay Case and Early Mediation re ADA Disability Access Litigation, filed by Defendants 4600 E2 LLC, Belmont-Arch, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order Application for Stay and Early Mediation Order) (Attorney Gavril T Gabriel added to party 4600 E2 LLC(pty:dft), Attorney Gavril T Gabriel added to party Belmont-Arch, Inc.(pty:dft)) (Gabriel, Gavril) |
|
Filing 8
STANDING ORDER by Judge John F. Walter. READ THIS ORDER CAREFULLY. IT CONTROLS THE CASE AND DIFFERS IN SOME RESPECTS FROM THE LOCAL RULES. This action has been assigned to the calendar of Judge John F. Walter. (iv)
|
| Filing 7 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendants 4600 E2 LLC, Belmont-Arch, Inc. (jtil) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (jtil) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge John F. Walter and Magistrate Judge Gail J. Standish. (jtil) |
| Filing 4 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by plaintiff Brian Whitaker. (Handy, Russell) |
| Filing 3 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Brian Whitaker, (Handy, Russell) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Brian Whitaker. (Handy, Russell) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: 0973-24787735 - Fee: $400, filed by plaintiff Brian Whitaker. (Attorney Russell C Handy added to party Brian Whitaker(pty:pla))(Handy, Russell) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
