Young Yil Jo et al v. Mr. Donald Trump et al
Young Yil Jo, Kum Nam Lee, Krystof Zawadzki and Hui Chung Jo |
Six Unknown Names Agents, Mr. Eric Garceti, Proland Management, Mr. Donald Trump, Dep HUD and Presbyterian Wilshire Church |
2:2019cv09805 |
November 15, 2019 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Jesus G Bernal |
Charles F Eick |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 21, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 ORDER by Judge Jesus G. Bernal: Denying #2 REQUEST to Proceed In Forma Pauperis. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that: This case is hereby DISMISSED immediately. MD JS-6, Case Terminated. (twdb) |
Filing 3 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Jesus G. Bernal and referred to Magistrate Judge Charles F. Eick. (esa) |
Filing 2 NOTICE OF FILING OF COMPLAINT WITHOUT PREPAYMENT OF FILING FEES OR REQUEST TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS (CV-93) filed by plaintiffs Hui Chung Jo, Young Yil Jo, Kum Nam Lee, Krystof Zawadzki. (esa) |
Filing 1 CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT filed against defendants Dep HUD, Eric Garceti, Presbyterian Wilshire Church, Proland Management, Six Unknown Names Agents, Donald Trump pursuant to 42 USC 1983pr. Case assigned to Judge Jesus G. Bernal and referred to Magistrate Judge Charles F. Eick, filed by plaintiffs Krystof Zawadzki, Kum Nam Lee, Hui Chung Jo, Young Yil Jo. (esa) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.