Jesse Boggs v. Los Angeles County Jail et al
Jesse Boggs |
Los Angeles County Jail and All Medical Supervisors |
2:2019cv09815 |
November 15, 2019 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
John D Early |
John F Walter |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 2, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 12 NOTICE OF CLERICAL ERROR: Due to clerical error Re: Order Dismissing Case, #10 The attachment to the IFP order was inadvertently left out. Attached hereto is the IFP order with attachment. Document number 10 has been replaced with the correct documents. (Attachments: #1 corrected IFP order) (mba) |
Filing 11 Letter from Plaintiff Jesse Boggs (hr) |
Filing 10 ORDER RE REQUEST TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS by Judge John F. Walter. IT IS ORDERED that the Request to Proceed In Forma Pauperis is hereby: DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that: This case is hereby DISMISSED immediately. Case Terminated. Made JS-6. (iv) (Main Document 10 replaced on 1/3/2020) (mba). |
RECOMMENDATION issued by Magistrate Judge John D. Early. Proposed Order forwarded to the District Judge for approval.(mba) |
Filing 6 NOTICE OF DISCREPANCY AND ORDER: by Magistrate Judge John D. Early, ORDERING Letter submitted by Plaintiff Jesse Boggs, received on 12/2/19, is not to be filed but instead rejected. Denial based on: Local Rule 11-3.8 Lacking name, address, phone, facsimile numbers, and e-mail address. (see document for further details). (hr) |
Filing 9 SUPPLEMENTAL RESPONSE filed by Plaintiff Jesse Boggs re Minutes of In Chambers Order #4 . (mba) |
Filing 8 RESPONSE filed by Plaintiff Jesse Boggs re Minutes of In Chambers Order #4 . (Attachments: #1 Supplement)(mba) |
Filing 7 Response re NOTICE OF FILING OF COMPLAINT WITHOUT PREPAYMENT OF FILING FEES OR REQUEST TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS (CV-93) #2 , filed by Plaintiff Jesse Boggs. (mba) |
Filing 5 NOTICE OF DISCREPANCY AND ORDER: by Magistrate Judge John D. Early, ORDERING Miscellaneous documents submitted by Plaintiff Jesse Boggs, received on 12/2/2019, is not to be filed but instead rejected. Denial based on: Local Rule 11-3.8 Lacking name, address, phone, facsimile numbers, and e-mail address. (see document for further details). (hr) |
Filing 4 MINUTE (IN CHAMBERS) Order re Complaint and Failure to Pay Filing Fee by Magistrate Judge John D. Early. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT, if Plaintiff still wishes to proceed with this action, he shall within thirty days from the date of this Order, either pay the entire $400 civil filling and administrative fee in full or complete and file a compliant and fully supported request to proceed IFP under 28 U.S.C 1915(a)(2). (see document for further details) (Attachments: #1 Civil Rights Complaint Form (CV-66), #2 Request to Proceed In Forma Pauperis Form, #3 Notice of Dismissal Form) (hr) |
Filing 3 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge John F. Walter and referred to Magistrate Judge John D. Early. (esa) |
Filing 2 NOTICE OF FILING OF COMPLAINT WITHOUT PREPAYMENT OF FILING FEES OR REQUEST TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS (CV-93) filed by plaintiff Jesse Boggs. (esa) |
Filing 1 CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT filed against defendants All Medical Supervisors, Los Angeles County Jail pursuant to 42 USC 1983pr. Case assigned to Judge John F. Walter and referred to Magistrate Judge John D. Early, filed by plaintiff Jesse Boggs. (esa) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.