Ernest Blackwell v. Neil McDowell
| Ernest Blackwell |
| Neil McDowell |
| 2:2019cv09870 |
| November 18, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Paul L Abrams |
| Philip S Gutierrez |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 4, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 8
MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS by Magistrate Judge Paul L. Abrams. The Court is in receipt of plaintiff's Status Report, filed on January 6, 2020. ECF No. 7. Plaintiff's next status report is due NO LATER THAN MARCH 9, 2020. #7 (ch)
|
| Filing 7 STATUS REPORT filed by Petitioner Ernest Blackwell. (sbou) |
| Filing 6 FINANCIAL ENTRY: Received $5.00 from Ernest Blackwell on 12/06/19. Re: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (2254) #1 . Receipt number LA198826. (jo) |
| Filing 5 MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) by Magistrate Judge Paul L. Abrams. Petitioner filed a Motion for stay and abeyance ("Motion" or "Mot.") of this action. Under the circumstances here, the Court finds that only the Kelly framework applies and GRANTS petitioner's request for a stay. Petitioner shall file a status report in this Court, on or before January 21, 2020, informing the Court of his progress in exhausting his claim in the California courts. Petitioner shall file further status reports every sixty days following his first status report on January 21, 2020 (i.e., on or before March 21, 2020, etc.) until such time as the California Supreme Court has issued its decision concerning petitioner's habeas petition to that court. SEE ORDER FOR DETAILS #2 (ch) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE OF REFERENCE to a U.S. Magistrate Judge. This case has been assigned to the calendar of the Honorable District Judge Philip S. Gutierrez and referred to Magistrate Judge Paul L. Abrams, who is authorized to consider preliminary matters and conduct all further hearings as may be appropriate or necessary. Pursuant to Local Rule 83-2.4, the Court must be notified within five (5) days of any address change. See notice for additional details. (lh) |
| Filing 3 ELECTION REGARDING CONSENT TO PROCEED before Magistrate Judge, in accordance with Title 28 Section 636(c) and F.R.CIV.P 73(b), filed by Petitioner Ernest Blackwell. (lh) |
| Filing 2 PETITIONER MOTION AND REQUEST for Stay and Abeyance of Habeas Corpus Proceedings, filed by Petitioner Ernest Blackwell. (lh) |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus by a Person In State Custody (28:2254). Case assigned to Judge Philip S. Gutierrez and referred to Magistrate Judge Paul L. Abrams. (Filing Fee $ 5 Due), filed by Petitioner Ernest Blackwell. (lh) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Ernest Blackwell v. Neil McDowell | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: Neil McDowell | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Ernest Blackwell | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
