Brian Whitaker v. Maria V. Montgomery et al
| Brian Whitaker |
| Does 1-10, Tommy and Teddy LLC and Maria V. Montgomery |
| 2:2019cv09880 |
| November 19, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Steve Kim |
| R Gary Klausner |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
| 42 U.S.C. § 12101 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 17, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 16
ORDER DECLINING SUPPLEMENTAL JURISDICTION AND DISMISSING PLAINTIFFS UNRUH CLAIM by Judge R. Gary Klausner: The Court, in its discretion, declines to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over plaintiff's Unruh Act claim. The Court therefore dismisses that claim without prejudice. See 28 USC Sub-section 1367(c)(2) and (c)(4). The Court likewise denies Plaintiff's requests for a certification for interlocutory appeal and for a stay pending the outcome of Ninth Circuit Case No. 19-55974. (jp)
|
| Filing 15 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Brian Whitaker, upon Defendant Maria V. Montgomery served on 1/5/2020, answer due 1/27/2020. in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by personal service.Original Summons returned. (Handy, Russell) |
| Filing 14 Text Only Entry: The Order to Show Cause #12 is discharged. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (sw) TEXT ONLY ENTRY |
| Filing 13 STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to Tommy and Teddy LLC answer now due 1/24/2020, re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Defendant Tommy and Teddy LLC.(Attorney Farid Novian added to party Tommy and Teddy LLC(pty:dft))(Novian, Farid) |
|
Filing 12
MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS by Judge R. Gary Klausner: ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE DISMISSAL FOR LACK OF PROSECUTION. Plaintiff(s) to show cause in writing on or before January 7, 2020 why this action should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution as to defendant Tommy and Teddy LLC. The Order To Show Cause willstand submitted upon the filing of plaintiffs response. The court will consider as satisfactory response: Plaintiffs application for entry of default pursuant to Rule 55a of the Federal Rules of Civil procedure as to defendant(s): Tommy and Teddy LLC (answer due 12/26/19) or A timely answer by the following defendant(s): Tommy and Teddy LLC (answer due 12/26/19). If a satisfactory response is not filed by the date listed above, the matter will bedismissed for lack of prosecution. (lc)
|
| Filing 11 RESPONSE filed by Plaintiff Brian Whitakerto Minutes of In Chambers Order/Directive - no proceeding held,, Set/Reset Deadlines, #10 (Attachments: #1 Declaration, #2 Declaration, #3 Exhibit 1, #4 Exhibit 2, #5 Proof of service)(Handy, Russell) |
|
Filing 10
MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS - ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE by Judge R. Gary Klausner. Plaintiff shall file a Response to this Order to Show Cause by no later than December 20, 2019. Failure to timely or adequately respond to this Order to Show Cause may, without further warning, result in the dismissal of the entire action without prejudice or the Court declining to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over the Unruh Act claim and the dismissal of that claim pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1367(c). (lom)
|
| Filing 9 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Brian Whitaker, upon Defendant Tommy and Teddy LLC served on 12/5/2019, answer due 12/26/2019. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Jane Doe - person in charge in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by substituted service at business address and by also mailing a copy.Original Summons returned. (Handy, Russell) |
|
Filing 8
STANDING ORDER REGARDING NEWLY ASSIGNED CASES by Judge R. Gary Klausner. (sw)
|
| Filing 7 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendants Maria V. Montgomery, Tommy and Teddy LLC. (lh) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (lh) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge R. Gary Klausner and Magistrate Judge Steve Kim. (lh) |
| Filing 4 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by plaintiff Brian Whitaker. (Handy, Russell) |
| Filing 3 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Brian Whitaker, (Handy, Russell) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Brian Whitaker. (Handy, Russell) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: 0973-24805423 - Fee: $400, filed by plaintiff Brian Whitaker. (Attorney Russell C Handy added to party Brian Whitaker(pty:pla))(Handy, Russell) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
