J. R. v. Lucia Mar Unified School District
J. R. |
Lucia Mar Unified School District |
2:2019cv09976 |
November 21, 2019 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Paul L Abrams |
Virginia A Phillips |
Civil Rights: Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 16, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 10 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint #1 as to Defendant Lucia Mar Unified School District. (bm) |
Filing 9 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff J. R.. (Shaw, Daniel) |
Filing 8 STANDING ORDER by Judge Virginia A. Phillips. (bh) |
Filing 7 ORDER by Magistrate Judge Paul L. Abrams: granting #6 PETITION to Appoint Guardian ad Litem. Appointing Andy Rocks as Guardian ad Litem for J.R. (sbou) |
Filing 6 PETITION for Appointment of Andy Rock as Guardian ad Litem for J.R. filed by Plaintiff J. R.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Shaw, Daniel) |
Filing 5 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plantiff J. R., identifying J.R., Lucia Mar Unified School District. (Shaw, Daniel) |
Filing 4 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCIES in Attorney Case Opening RE: Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 . The following error(s) was found: No Notice of Interested Parties has been filed. A Notice of Interested Parties must be filed with every partys first appearance. See Local Rule 7.1-1. Counsel must file a Notice of Interested Parties immediately. Failure to do so may be addressed by judicial action, including sanctions. See Local Rule 83-7. It appears a guardian ad litem is named in this case but no Petition seeking such appointment has been filed. A Petition for the Appointment of a Guardian Ad Litem must be filed when the appointment of a guardian ad litem is required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 17(c)(2). See Local Rule 17-1. Counsel must file a Petition for the Appointment of a Guardian Ad Litem immediately. Failure to do so may be addressed by judicial action, including sanctions. See Local Rule 83-7. Other error(s) with document(s): The Civil Cover Sheet is attached to the Complaint. It should have been filed and entered separately under its proper event. (et) |
Filing 3 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (et) |
Filing 2 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Virginia A. Phillips and Magistrate Judge Paul L. Abrams. (et) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: 0973-24825942 - Fee: $400, filed by plaintiff J. R.. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (Attorney Daniel R Shaw added to party J. R.(pty:pla))(Shaw, Daniel) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: J. R. v. Lucia Mar Unified School District | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Lucia Mar Unified School District | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: J. R. | |
Represented By: | Daniel R Shaw |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.