Steven Yearwood v. The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.
| Steven Yearwood |
| The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. |
| 2:2019cv09995 |
| November 21, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Steve Kim |
| George H Wu |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1446 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 17, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 14 JOINT REPORT Rule 26(f) Discovery Plan ; estimated length of trial 2 days, filed by Defendant The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc... (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1)(Fredrich, Christopher) |
| Filing 13 AMENDED MINUTES held before Judge George H. Wu re: Minutes of In Chambers Order/Directive - no proceeding held, Set/Reset Motion Hearing and R&R Deadlines, Set/Reset Deadlines/Hearings, #12 . This action has been reassigned to the HONORABLE GEORGE H. WU, United States District Judge, and the Honorable Steve Kim, United States Magistrate Judge. (mrgo) |
Filing 12
MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS - TRANSFER OF CASE TO JUDGE WU by Judge George H. Wu. This action has been reassigned to the HONORABLE GEORGE H. WU, United States District Judge. The magistrate judge's initials remain the same. Please substitute the initials GW in place of the initials AB. The case number will now read: CV 19-9995-GW-SKx. As documents are routed using the judge's initials, it is important to use the correct initials on all subsequent filings. (SEE DOCUMENT FOR FULL DETAILS). Defendant the Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.'s Motion to Dismiss Complaint #7 , filed on November 27, 2019, and set for hearing on January 10, 2020 is continued to January 27, 2020 at 8:30 a.m. The Court sets a Scheduling Conference for January 27, 2020 at 8:30 a.m. Counsel are reminded of their obligations to disclose information, confer on a discovery plan, and report to the Court, as required by F.R.C.P. 26 and the Local Rules of this Court. Trial counsel are ordered to be present. A Joint 26(f) Report shall be filed with the Court no later than January 17, 2020. See Local Rule 26-1. (mrgo)
|
|
Filing 11
Standing Order Re Final Pre-Trial Conferences for Civil Jury Trials Before Judge George H. Wu by Judge George H. Wu. (See document for details). (et)
|
| Filing 10 Amendment to NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Case Notice of Motion and Motion of Defendant Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. to Dismiss Complaint #7 filed by Defendant The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.. (Rao, Arjun) |
|
Filing 9
ORDER RE TRANSFER PURSUANT TO GENERAL ORDER 19-03-Related Case- filed. Related Case No: 2:19-cv-07855 GW(SKx). Case transferred from Judge Andre Birotte Jr and Magistrate Judge Jean P. Rosenbluth to Judge George H. Wu and Magistrate Judge Steve Kim for all further proceedings. The case number will now reflect the initials of the transferee Judge 2:19-cv-09995 GW(SKx). Signed by Judge George H. Wu (rn)
|
| Filing 8 REQUEST FOR JUDICIAL NOTICE re NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Case Notice of Motion and Motion of Defendant Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. to Dismiss Complaint #7 filed by Defendant The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1-7)(Rao, Arjun) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Case Notice of Motion and Motion of Defendant Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. to Dismiss Complaint filed by defendant The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.. Motion set for hearing on 1/10/2020 at 10:00 AM before Judge Andre Birotte Jr. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Rao, Arjun) |
|
Filing 6
STANDING ORDER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Andre Birotte Jr. (cb)
|
| Filing 5 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (et) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Andre Birotte Jr and Magistrate Judge Jean P. Rosenbluth. (et) |
| CONFORMED FILED COPY OF COMPLAINT against Defendant The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc., filed by Plaintiff Steven Yearwood. [FILED IN STATE COURT ON 9/12/2019 SUBMITTED ATTACHED TO EXHIBIT A TO NOTICE OF REMOVAL #1 . (et) |
| Filing 3 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc., (Attorney Arjun P Rao added to party The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.(pty:dft))(Rao, Arjun) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendant The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.. (Rao, Arjun) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Los Angeles Superior Court, case number 19STCV32394 Receipt No: 0973-24829388 - Fee: $400. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A) (Attorney Arjun P Rao added to party The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.(pty:dft))(Rao, Arjun) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Steven Yearwood v. The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. | |
| Represented By: | Arjun P Rao |
| Represented By: | Ali Fesharaki |
| Represented By: | Christopher R Fredrich |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Steven Yearwood | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
