Brooklyn Godin v. Andrew M. Saul
Brooklyn Godin |
Andrew M. Saul |
2:2019cv10042 |
November 23, 2019 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Steve Kim |
Social Security: SSID Tit. XIV |
42 U.S.C. ยง 405 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 7, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 11 NOTICE TO COUNSEL: ALL PARTIES having consented to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge, this case has been reassigned to Magistrate Judge Steve Kim for all further proceedings. Please use the case number CV19-10042 SK on all documents subsequently filed to ensure the proper routing of all filings. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. TEXT ONLY ENTRY. (sn) |
Filing 10 CONSENT TO PROCEED before Magistrate Judge, in accordance with Title 28 Section 636(c) and F.R.CIV.P 73(b), filed by Defendant Andrew M. Saul. (Attorney In Seon Jeong added to party Andrew M. Saul(pty:dft))(Jeong, In) |
Filing 9 STATEMENT OF CONSENT TO PROCEED before the assigned Magistrate Judge filed by Plaintiff Brooklyn Godin. (Feld, Benjamin) |
Filing 8 NOTICE AND ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF SERVICE of Summons and Complaint returned Executed filed by Plaintiff Brooklyn Godin, upon Defendant Andrew M. Saul acknowledgment sent by Plaintiff on 12/9/2019, answer due 12/30/2019. Acknowledgment of Service signed by Benjamin Feld, Attorney. (Feld, Benjamin) |
Filing 7 ORDER RE: PROCEDURES IN SOCIAL SECURITY APPEAL by Magistrate Judge Steve Kim. (see document for details) (Attachments: #1 Blank Consent Form CV-11) (hr) |
Filing 6 60 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant Andrew M. Saul. (et) |
Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Fernando M. Olguin and referred to Magistrate Judge Steve Kim. (et) |
Filing 4 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Certificate/Notice of Interested Parties #3 , Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 , Civil Cover Sheet (CV-71) #2 filed by Plaintiff Brooklyn Godin. (Feld, Benjamin) |
Filing 3 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Brooklyn Godin, (Feld, Benjamin) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Movant Brooklyn Godin. (Feld, Benjamin) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: 0973-24839293 - Fee: $400, filed by Plaintiff Brooklyn Godin. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit) (Attorney Benjamin Paul Feld added to party Brooklyn Godin(pty:bkmov))(Feld, Benjamin) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Brooklyn Godin v. Andrew M. Saul | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Brooklyn Godin | |
Represented By: | Benjamin Paul Feld |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Andrew M. Saul | |
Represented By: | In Seon Jeong |
Represented By: | Assistant US Attorney LA-SSA |
Represented By: | Assistant US Attorney LA-CV |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.