Michael Fimbres v. M. Pollard
Michael Fimbres |
M. Pollard |
2:2019cv10113 |
November 26, 2019 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Western Division - Los Angeles Office |
David O Carter |
Karen L Stevenson |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 8, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE: DISMISSAL by Magistrate Judge Karen L. Stevenson. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, no later than February 4, 2020, Petitioner shall file either: (1) a First Amended Petition that complies with the Court's December 4, 2019 Order; or (2) a signed application for an enlargement of time and competent evidence, such as a declaration signed under penalty of perjury, demonstrating good cause for such an extension. (see document for further details) (Attachments: #1 State Habeas Petition Form, #2 Notice of Dismissal Form) (hr) |
Filing 6 (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE: DISMISSAL by Magistrate Judge Karen L. Stevenson.IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Petitioner shall SHOW CAUSE no later than December 26, 2019 why the Petition should not be dismissed for failure to comply with Habeas Rule 2(c) and Habeas Rule 4. (see document for further details) (Attachments: #1 State Habeas Petition Form, #2 Petition) (hr) |
Filing 5 MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER DENYING REQUEST FOR COUNSEL #3 by Magistrate Judge Karen L. Stevenson. Petitioner has not satisfied the standard for appointment of counsel in a federal habeas case, and IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Motion is DENIED without prejudice. (see document for further details) (hr) |
Filing 4 NOTICE OF REFERENCE to a U.S. Magistrate Judge. This case has been assigned to the calendar of the Honorable District Judge David O. Carter and referred to Magistrate Judge Karen L. Stevenson, who is authorized to consider preliminary matters and conduct all further hearings as may be appropriate or necessary. Pursuant to Local Rule 83-2.4, the Court must be notified within five (5) days of any address change. See notice for additional details. (ghap) |
Filing 3 MOTION REQUESTING for Appointment of Counsel with Points and Authorities in Support Thereof, filed by petitioner Michael Fimbres. (ghap) |
Filing 2 ELECTION REGARDING CONSENT TO PROCEED before Magistrate Judge, in accordance with Title 28 Section 636(c) and F.R.CIV.P 73(b), filed by Petitioner Michael Fimbres. (ghap) |
Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus by a Person In State Custody (28:2254) Case assigned to Judge David O. Carter and referred to Magistrate Judge Karen L Stevenson.(Filing fee $ 5: FEE DUE.), filed by petitioner Michael Fimbres. (ghap) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Michael Fimbres v. M. Pollard | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner: Michael Fimbres | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Respondent: M. Pollard | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.