Harold Epps v. HSBC Bank USA National Association et al
| Harold Epps |
| DOES 1 to 100, inclusive and HSBC Bank USA National Association |
| 2:2019cv10145 |
| November 27, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Philip S Gutierrez |
| Suzanne H Segal |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 18, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 13 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (wm) |
Filing 12
CORRECTED ORDER SETTING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Judge Philip S. Gutierrez. Scheduling Conference set for 3/9/2020 at 02:00 PM. (wm)
|
|
Filing 11
ORDER SETTING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Judge Philip S. Gutierrez. Scheduling Conference set for 3/9/2020 at 02:30 PM. (wm)
|
|
Filing 10
STANDING ORDER REGARDING NEWLY ASSIGNED CASES by Judge Philip S. Gutierrez. (ji)
|
| Filing 9 NOTICE OF REASSIGNMENT of MJDAP case from Magistrate Judge Patrick J. Walsh to Judge Philip S. Gutierrez for all further proceedings. Any discovery matters that may be referred to a Magistrate Judge are assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Suzanne H. Segal. The case number will now reflect the initials of the transferee Judges 2:19-cv-10145 PSG (SSx). (esa) |
| Filing 8 STATEMENT Declining to Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge filed by Defendant HSBC Bank USA National Association (Schneider, Laura) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE TO COUNSEL re Magistrate Judge Direct Assignment Program. This case has been randomly assigned to Magistrate Judge Patrick J. Walsh. (Attachments: #1 CV-11C) (car) |
| CONFORMED COPY OF ANSWER to Complaint - (Discovery) filed by Defendant HSBC Bank USA National Association. Filed in state Court on 11/25/19 Submitted with Attachment 6 to Notice of Removal #6 (car) |
| CONFORMED COPY OF COMPLAINT against Defendants Does 1-100, inclusive, HSBC Bank USA National Association. Jury Demanded, filed by plaintiff Harold Epps. Filed in state Court on 10/28/19 Submitted with Attachment 2 to Notice of Removal #1 (car) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Los Angeles Superior Court, case number 19STCV39111 with filing fee previously paid ($400.00 paid on 11/27/2019, receipt number 0973-24860554), filed by Defendant HSBC Bank USA National Association. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Laura Schneider, #2 Exhibit 1 to Schneider Dec (state court Complaint), #3 Exhibit 2 to Schneider Dec (state court Notice of Assignment), #4 Exhibit 3 to Schneider Dec (state court Summons), #5 Exhibit 4 to Schneider Dec (state court Civil Case Cover Sheet), #6 Exhibit 5 to Schneider Dec (state court Answer), #7 Declaration of Todd Cichos)(Schneider, Laura) |
| Filing 5 PROOF OF SERVICE filed by Defendant HSBC Bank USA National Association, served on November 27, 2019. (Schneider, Laura) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Related Case(s) filed by Defendant HSBC Bank USA National Association. (Schneider, Laura) |
| Filing 3 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Defendant HSBC Bank USA National Association identifying HSBC Holdings plc as Corporate Parent. (Schneider, Laura) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant HSBC Bank USA National Association, (Attorney Laura E Schneider added to party HSBC Bank USA National Association(pty:dft))(Schneider, Laura) |
| Filing 1 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendant HSBC Bank USA National Association. (Schneider, Laura) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
