Daniel Martinez et al v. Ford Motor Company et al
Daniel Martinez |
Ford Motor Company and DOES 1 to 10 |
2:2019cv10154 |
November 25, 2019 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Philip S Gutierrez |
Alka Sagar |
Contract Product Liability |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Notice of Removal - Breach of Contract |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 19, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 15 TRANSMITTAL of documents to Kern County Superior Court. A certified copy of the order of remand and a copy of the docket sheet from this court was sent to Kern County Superior Court, Bakersfield, CA 93301. (bm) |
![]() |
Filing 13 First NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Remand Case to Kern County Superior Court- Metro Division filed by Plaintiff Daniel Martinez. Motion set for hearing on 3/9/2020 at 01:30 PM before Judge Philip S. Gutierrez. (Attachments: #1 Declaration, #2 Proposed Order) (Cline, Brian) |
![]() |
Filing 11 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Documents RE: Motion to Remand #9 , Memorandum in Support of Motion #10 . The following error(s) was/were found: Incorrect event selected. Correct event to be used is: Applications/Ex Parte Applications/Motions/Petitions/Requests-Remand Case to State Court. Other error(s) with document(s): Noticed motion hearing date is not indicated in docket entry text. Docket entry text does not match caption of attached document. In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (bm) |
Filing 10 DOCUMENT STRICKEN ON 12/27/19. MEMORANDUM in Support Plaintiff's Motion to Remand filed by Plaintiff Daniel Martinez. (Attachments: #1 Declaration Declaration in support of Plaintiff's Motion to Remand)(Cline, Brian) Modified on 1/2/2020 (bm). |
Filing 9 DOCUMENT STRICKEN ON 12/27/19. MEMORANDUM in Support Plaintiff's Motion to Remand filed by Plaintiff Daniel Martinez. (Cline, Brian) Modified on 1/2/2020 (bm). |
![]() |
![]() |
Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (jtil) |
Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Philip S. Gutierrez and Magistrate Judge Alka Sagar. (jtil) |
Filing 4 NOTICE RE INTRA-DISTRICT TRANSFER by Clerk of Court due to incorrect intra- district venue selected by the filer. Case is transferred to the Western Division. Case has been assigned to Judge Philip S. Gutierrez for all further proceedings. Any matters that may be referred to a Magistrate Judge are assigned to Alka Sagar. New Case Number 2:19-cv-10154 PSG (ASx). (jtil) |
NON CONFORMED COPY OF ANSWER to Complaint filed by Defendant Ford Motor Company, attached as Exhibit C.(jtil) |
CONFORMED COPY OF COMPLAINT filed by Plaintiff Daniel Martinez in Kern County Superior Court on 7/9/2019, attached as Exhibit B. (jtil) |
Filing 3 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendant Ford Motor Company. (Sanders, Justin) |
Filing 2 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Ford Motor Company. (Sanders, Justin) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Kern County, case number BCV-19-101885 Receipt No: 0973-24840640 - Fee: $400, filed by Defendant Ford Motor Company. (Attachments: #1 Declaration Declaration of Sabrina Narain) (Attorney Justin H Sanders added to party Ford Motor Company (pty:dft))(Sanders, Justin) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.