Ivan Soto v. Scott Fraugnheim
Ivan Soto |
Scott Fraugnheim |
2:2019cv10172 |
November 27, 2019 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Alexander F MacKinnon |
John F Walter |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 1, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 8 ORDER by Magistrate Judge Alexander F. MacKinnon: granting #7 APPLICATION for Extension of Time. It is hereby ordered that Respondent is GRANTED to February 16, 2020, to file an Answer to the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus. (sbou) |
Filing 7 APPLICATION for Extension of Time to File Response to Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus; Declaration of Shezad H. Thakor filed by Respondent Scott Fraugnheim. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Thakor, Shezad) |
Filing 6 MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) Order Granting Request to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (ECF No. #5 ) by Magistrate Judge Alexander F. MacKinnon. Petitioner's request to proceed without prepayment of filing fees is GRANTED, and the filing fee is waived. (sbou) |
Filing 5 REQUEST to Proceed Without Prepayment of Filing Fees with Declaration in Support filed by Petitioner Ivan Soto. (sbou) |
Filing 4 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE of California Attorney General Office Deputy Attorney General Shezad H. Thakor on behalf of Respondent Scott Fraugnheim. (Attorney Shezad Hanif Thakor added to party Scott Fraugnheim(pty:res))(Thakor, Shezad) |
Filing 3 ORDER REQUIRING RESPONSE TO PETITION by Magistrate Judge Alexander F. MacKinnon: that Respondent Scott Fraugnheim file Answer to the Petition not later than 1/21/2020. Notice: The court has issued a ruling on preliminary review. Pursuant to the Agreement on Acceptance of Service between the Clerk of Court and the California Attorney Generals Office, this Notice constitutes service under Fed. R. Civ. P. 4. Motions to Dismiss shall be filed by 1/6/2020. (Attachments: #1 Attachment 1, #2 Attachment 2) (sbou) |
Filing 2 NOTICE OF REFERENCE to a U.S. Magistrate Judge. This case has been assigned to the calendar of the Honorable District Judge John F. Walter and referred to Magistrate Judge Alexander F. MacKinnon, who is authorized to consider preliminary matters and conduct all further hearings as may be appropriate or necessary. Pursuant to Local Rule 83-2.4, the Court must be notified within five (5) days of any address change. See notice for additional details. (Attachments: #1 CV111) (jtil) |
Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus by a Person In State Custody (28:2254), filed by Petitioner Ivan Soto. Case assigned to Judge John F. Walter and referred to Magistrate Judge Alexander F. MacKinnon. (jtil) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Ivan Soto v. Scott Fraugnheim | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner: Ivan Soto | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Respondent: Scott Fraugnheim | |
Represented By: | Shezad Hanif Thakor |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.