Frank Grant v. PY Holding LLC et al
Frank Alexander Grant IV and Frank Grant |
alan bushell, AVIS Budget Group, Inc., PY Holdings, LLC, PY Holding LLC and Allan W. Bushell |
2:2019cv10260 |
December 3, 2019 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Maria A Audero |
Cormac J Carney |
P.I.: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 17, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 12 MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER DISMISSING ACTION ON NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL by Judge Cormac J. Carney. The Court, having been advised by the Plaintiff that this action has been resolved by a Notice of Dismissal #11 , hereby orders this action dismissed without prejudice. The Court hereby orders all proceedings in the case vacated and taken off calendar. (Made JS-6. Case Terminated.) (iv) |
Filing 11 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal filed by Plaintiff Frank Grant. Dismissal is without prejudice. (Grant, Frank) |
Filing 10 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Frank Grant, upon Defendant Allan W. Bushell served on 12/10/2019, answer due 12/31/2019. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Barbara Bushell, wife of Defendant in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by substituted service at home address and by also mailing a copy.Original Summons NOT returned. (Grant, Frank) |
Filing 9 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCIES in Attorney Case Opening RE: to Proceed In Forma Pauperis, Declaration in Support #3 . The following error(s) was found: Other error(s) with document(s): An incorrect event was selected for Document No. 3 Application to Proceed without Paying Fees. The correct event is Proced in Forma Pauperis. You are not required to take any action in response to this notice unless the Court so directs. (lh) |
Filing 8 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (lh) |
Filing 7 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Cormac J. Carney and Magistrate Judge Maria A. Audero. (lh) |
Filing 6 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Amended Complaint/Petition, #4 filed by Plaintiff Frank Alexander Grant IV. (Grant, Frank) |
Filing 5 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff All Plaintiffs, (Grant, Frank) |
Filing 4 ***DUPLICATE TO DOCUMENT NO. 1*** COMPLAINT against Defendant Frank Alexander Grant IV amending Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 , filed by Plaintiff Frank Alexander Grant IV (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Supplement Fee Waiver)(Grant, Frank) Modified on 12/6/2019 (lh). |
Filing 3 Application to Proceed without Paying Fees filed by Plaintiff Frank Alexander Grant IV Frank Grant (Grant, Frank) Modified on 12/6/2019 (lh). |
Filing 2 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCIES in Attorney Case Opening RE: Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 . The following error(s) was found: A case-initiating document was submitted without payment of the full filing fee. Within two business days of this notice, counsel must pay the filing fee or file a request to proceed in forma pauperis;otherwise, the docket for this case number will be closed and no further filings will be permitted under this case number. The filing fee may be paid online by docketing the event Pay Filing Fee. (lh) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT with In Forma Pauperis request, filed by Plaintiff Frank Alexander Grant IV. (Attorney Frank Alexander Grant, IV added to party Frank Alexander Grant IV (pty:pla))(Grant, Frank) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.