SolutionInc Limited v. Zyxel Communications, Inc.
| SolutionInc Limited |
| Zyxel Communications, Inc |
| Solutioninc Technologies Limited |
| 2:2019cv10306 |
| December 4, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Charles F Eick |
| Philip S Gutierrez |
| Patent |
| 35 U.S.C. ยง 271 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 6, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 14
ORDER GRANTING EXTENSION OF TIME TO ANSWER COMPLAINT #13 by Judge Philip S. Gutierrez: GOOD CAUSE APPEARING, it is hereby ordered that the time Defendant ZyXel Communications, Inc. has to answer, move, or otherwise respond to Plaintiff SolutionInc Limited's Complaint is extended to February 3, 2020. (bm)
|
| Filing 13 First STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to SolutionInc Limited answer now due 2/3/2020, re Service of Summons and Complaint Returned Executed (21 days), #12 , Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 , Summons Issued (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #8 filed by Plaintiff SolutionInc Limited. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Anderson, Kirk) |
| Filing 12 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff SolutionInc Limited, upon Defendant Zyxel Communications, Inc served on 12/13/2019, answer due 1/3/2020. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon LORELIE PAUNAN ESBER - Registered Agent in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by personal service.Original Summons returned. (Anderson, Kirk) |
|
Filing 11
STANDING ORDER REGARDING NEWLY ASSIGNED CASES by Judge Philip S. Gutierrez. (ji)
|
|
Filing 10
NOTICE AND ORDER REGARDING TRANSFER AND/OR REASSIGNMENT OF PATENT CASE by Judge Fernando M. Olguin. Case transferred from Judge Fernando M. Olguin to Judge Philip S. Gutierrez for all further proceedings. Case number now reads 2:19-cv-10306 PSG(Ex). (rn)
|
|
Filing 9
ORDER RETURNING CASE FOR REASSIGNMENT by Judge Dean D. Pregerson. ORDER case returned to the Clerk for random reassignment pursuant to General Order 19-03. Case randomly reassigned from Judge Dean D. Pregerson to Judge Fernando M. Olguin for all further proceedings. The case number will now reflect the initials of the transferee Judge 2:19-cv-10306 FMO (Ex). (esa)
|
| Filing 8 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 as to Defendant Zyxel Communications, Inc. (car) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (car) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Dean D. Pregerson and Magistrate Judge Charles F. Eick. (car) |
| Filing 5 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Civil Cover Sheet (CV-71) #2 , Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 , Corporate Disclosure Statement #3 , Report on Filing of Patent/Trademark Action (Initial Notification)(AO 120) #4 filed by Plaintiff Solutioninc Technologies Limited. (Anderson, Kirk) |
| Filing 4 REPORT ON THE FILING OF AN ACTION Regarding a Patent or a Trademark (Initial Notification) filed by Solutioninc Technologies Limited. (Anderson, Kirk) |
| Filing 3 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Movant Solutioninc Technologies Limited (Anderson, Kirk) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Movant Solutioninc Technologies Limited. (Anderson, Kirk) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: 0973-24895151 - Fee: $400, filed by Plaintiff Solutioninc Technologies Limited. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Exhibit) (Attorney Kirk J Anderson added to party Solutioninc Technologies Limited(pty:bkmov))(Anderson, Kirk) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
