Judith Locke v. Dennis Massie et al
| Judith Locke |
| State of California Franchise Tax Board, United States of America Department of the Treasury Internal Revenue Service, DOES 6 THROUGH 30, Citibank, N.A., R. Michael DeVitt, Cavalry SPV I, LLC, Samantha Massie, Dennis Massie, Does 6 through 10 and Doe |
| 2:2019cv10413 |
| December 9, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Alka Sagar |
| John F Walter |
| Taxes |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1441 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 17, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 13 TRANSMITTAL of documents to San Luis Obispo County Superior Court. A certified copy of the order of remand and a copy of the docket sheet from this court was sent to San Luis Obispo County Superior Court, Paso Robles. (iv) |
Filing 12
MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER REMANDING ACTION TO SAN LUIS OBISPO SUPERIOR COURT by Judge John F. Walter. This action is REMANDED to San Luis Obispo Superior Court. Case Terminated. Made JS-6 (iv)
|
| Filing 11 NOTICE Rule 26(f) Report filed by Plaintiff Judith Locke Judith Locke. (Fricks, John) |
| Filing 10 NOTICE OF DISMISSAL filed by Plaintiff Judith Locke Judith Locke pursuant to FRCP 41a(1) as to United States of America Department of the Treasury Internal Revenue Service. (Fricks, John) |
| Filing 9 Text Entry Order: Plaintiffs Motion for (1) Leave to Amend Complaint and (2) Continuance of Scheduling Hearing filed on December 20, 2019 (Docket No. #8 ) is STRICKEN for failure to comply with Local Rule 7-3 which requires the conference of counsel to take place at least seven days prior to the filing of the Motion and paragraph 5(b) of the Courts Standing Order which requires the Joint Statement to be filed 3 days after the Local Rule 7-3 conference. If Plaintiff wishes to re-file the Motion, lead counsel shall meet and confer in person by January 10, 2020. If the parties cannot resolve the issues raised in the Motion, within 3 days of the meet and confer, each party shall file a declaration setting forth the issues resolved at the conference and those issues that were not resolved with a detailed explanation of why those issues could not be resolved. If a Motion remains necessary, it shall not be filed until 2 days after each party files the declaration required by this Order. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (droj) TEXT ONLY ENTRY |
| Filing 8 ***STRICKEN*** First NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to AMEND Complaint and Continuance of Scheduling Hearing filed by Plaintiff Judith Locke Judith Locke. Motion set for hearing on 1/27/2020 at 01:30 PM before Judge John F. Walter. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit A to Motion for Leave to Amend Complaint, #2 Declaration Proof of Service on Motion) (Fricks, John) Modified on 1/2/2020 (droj). |
|
Filing 7
MINUTE ORDER (IN CHAMBERS): COURT ORDER by Judge John F. Walter. Counsel are hereby notified that a Scheduling Conference has been set for February 3, 2020 at 1:15 p.m. before Judge John F. Walter. Lead Trial Counsel shall attend all proceedings before this Court, including the Scheduling Conference. Counsel are directed to comply with Rule 26 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 26-1 in a timely fashion and to file a Joint Report, on or before January 17, 2020. (lom)
|
|
Filing 6
STANDING ORDER by Judge John F. Walter. READ THIS ORDER CAREFULLY. IT CONTROLS THE CASE AND DIFFERS IN SOME RESPECTS FROM THE LOCAL RULES. (lom)
|
| Filing 5 TEXT ONLY ENTRY ORDER DISMISSING DOES: Pursuant to Local Rule 19-1, no complaint or petition shall be filed that includes more than ten Doe or fictitiously named parties. Accordingly, the Court hereby dismisses the action as to Doe Defendants 11 through 30, inclusive. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (sr) TEXT ONLY ENTRY |
|
Filing 4
ORDER RETURNING CASE FOR REASSIGNMENT by Judge Christina A. Snyder. ORDER case returned to the Clerk for random reassignment pursuant to General Order 19-03. Case randomly reassigned from Judge Christina A. Snyder to Judge John F. Walter for all further proceedings. The case number will now reflect the initials of the transferee Judge 2:19-cv-10413 JFW(ASx). (rn)
|
| Filing 3 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Christina A. Snyder and Magistrate Judge Alka Sagar. (car) |
| CONFORMED COPY OF COMPLAINT against Defendants Does 1 through 30, inclusive, Dennis Massie, Samantha Massie. Jury Demanded, filed by Plaintiff Judith Locke. Filed in State Court on 3/27/18 Submitted with Attachment 1 to Notice of Removal #1 (car) |
| CONFORMED COPY OF AMENDMENT TO COMPLAINT TO SUBSTITUTE TRUE NAMES FOR FICTITIOUS NAMES PURSUANT TO CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE SECTION 474 as to Doe Defendants 1 through 5. Amending Complaint - (Discovery), filed by Plaintiff Judith Locke. Filed in State Court on 8/7/2019 Submitted with Attachment 1 to Notice of Removal #1 (car) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendant United States of America Department of the Treasury Internal Revenue Service. (Ellis, John) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Superior Court County of San Luis Obispo, case number 18CVP-0105 No Fee Required - US Government, filed by Defendant United States of America Department of the Treasury Internal Revenue Service. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1-3) (Attorney John Ellis added to party United States of America Department of the Treasury Internal Revenue Service(pty:dft))(Ellis, John) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
