Chris Langer v. 8455 LLC et al
| Chris Langer |
| 8455 LLC, Does 1-10 and ZYJ Corp. |
| 2:2019cv10425 |
| December 10, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| R Gary Klausner |
| Gail J Standish |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
| 42 U.S.C. § 12101 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 5, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 21 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY Re: REQUEST for Clerk to Enter Default against defendant 8455 LLC #20 . The Clerk cannot enter the requested relief as: Time to respond has not expired. (jp) |
| Filing 20 REQUEST for Clerk to Enter Default against defendant 8455 LLC filed by Plaintiff Chris Langer. (Attachments: #1 Declaration, #2 Proof of service) (Grace, Phyl) |
| Filing 19 Joint STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to 8455 LLC answer now due 2/26/2020, re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Defendant 8455 LLC.(Attorney Sam Yebri added to party 8455 LLC(pty:dft))(Yebri, Sam) |
| Filing 18 PROOF OF SERVICE filed by plaintiff Chris Langer, re Initial Order Setting R26 Scheduling Conference - form only,,, #16 served on 1/13/2020. (Handy, Russell) |
| Filing 17 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Defendant ZYJ Corp. identifying ZYJ Corp. as Corporate Parent. (Napoles, Steven) |
Filing 16
ORDER SETTING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Judge R. Gary Klausner. A Scheduling Conference has been placed on calendar for May 11, 2020 at 9:00 a.m. The Conference will be held pursuant to F.R.Civ. P. 16(b). Trial counsel must be present and there are no telephonic appearances. Counsel are ordered to file a joint statement providing a brief factual summary of the case, including the claims being asserted. The parties are reminded of their obligations to disclose information and confer on a discovery plan not later than 21 days prior to the scheduling conference, and to file a joint statement with the Court not later than 14 days after they confer, as required by F.R. Civ.P. 26 and the Local Rules of this Court. Failure to comply may lead to the imposition of sanctions. Plaintiff's counsel is directed to give notice of the scheduling conference to each party that makes an initial appearance in the action after this date. Rule 26 Meeting Report due by 5/4/2020. (sw)
|
| Filing 15 Text Only Entry: The Court has reviewed the answer filed by defendant ZYJ Corp. (docket entry 14). Counsel shall file the required Notice of Interested Parties (LR 7-1.1) not later than 12:00 noon on January 13, 2020. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (sw) TEXT ONLY ENTRY |
| Filing 14 ANSWER to Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Defendant ZYJ Corp..(Attorney Steven R Napoles added to party ZYJ Corp.(pty:dft))(Napoles, Steven) |
| Filing 13 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Chris Langer, upon Defendant ZYJ Corp. served on 1/5/2020, answer due 1/27/2020. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Erin Jiang - the manager in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by substituted service at business address and by also mailing a copy.Original Summons returned. (Handy, Russell) |
| Filing 12 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Chris Langer, upon Defendant 8455 LLC served on 1/5/2020, answer due 1/27/2020. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Jenni novales - the receptionist in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by substituted service at business address and by also mailing a copy.Original Summons returned. (Handy, Russell) |
|
Filing 11
MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS - ORDER DECLINING SUPPLEMENTAL JURISDICTION by Judge R. Gary Klausner. For all of the foregoing reasons, the Court, in its discretion, declines to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over plaintiff's Unruh Act claim. The Court therefore dismisses that claim without prejudice. (lom)
|
| Filing 10 RESPONSE filed by Plaintiff Chris Langerto Order to Show Cause, #9 (Attachments: #1 Declaration, #2 Declaration, #3 Exhibit 1, #4 Exhibit 2, #5 Proof of service)(Handy, Russell) |
|
Filing 9
MINUTE IN CHAMBERS - ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE by Judge R. Gary Klausner: Plaintiff shall file a Response to this Order to Show Cause by no later than 12/23/2019. Failure to timely or adequately respond to this Order to Show Cause may, without further warning, result in the dismissal of the entire action without prejudice or the Court declining to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over the Unruh Act claim and the dismissal of that claim pursuant to 28 USC section 1367(c). (jp)
|
|
Filing 8
STANDING ORDER REGARDING NEWLY ASSIGNED CASES by Judge R. Gary Klausner. (sw)
|
| Filing 7 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendants 8455 LLC, ZYJ Corp.. (car) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (car) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge R. Gary Klausner and Magistrate Judge Gail J. Standish. (car) |
| Filing 4 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by plaintiff Chris Langer. (Handy, Russell) |
| Filing 3 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Chris Langer, (Handy, Russell) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Chris Langer. (Handy, Russell) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: 0973-24921464 - Fee: $400, filed by plaintiff Chris Langer. (Attorney Russell C Handy added to party Chris Langer(pty:pla))(Handy, Russell) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
