Bells Hakala v. HaptX, Inc.
| Bells Hakala |
| HAPTX, INC. |
| 2:2019cv10447 |
| December 10, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Michael W Fitzgerald |
| Michael R Wilner |
| Labor: Labor/Mgt. Relations |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 17, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 10
ORDER SETTING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Judge Michael W. Fitzgerald. Scheduling Conference set for 3/9/2020 at 11:00 AM. See order for complete details. (jre)
|
| Filing 9 NOTICE of Compliance filed by defendant HaptX, Inc.. (Rastegar, Diba) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (lh) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Michael W. Fitzgerald and Magistrate Judge Michael R. Wilner. (lh) |
| CONFORMED FILED COPY OF ANSWER to Complaint, filed by Defendant HaptX, Inc. (FILED IN SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT ON 12/9/2019 SUBMITTED ATTACHED TO NOTICE OF REMOVAL #1 )(lh) |
| NON-CONFORMED NOTICE AND ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF RECEIPT of Summons and Complaint returned Executed filed by Plaintiff Bells Hakala, upon Defendant HaptX, acknowledgment sent by Plaintiff on 11/6/2019, answer due 11/27/2019. (SUBMITTED ATTACHED TO NOTICE OF REMOVAL #1 ) (lh) |
| CONFORMED FILED COPY OF COMPLAINT against Defendants HaptX, Inc. Jury Demanded, filed by Plaintiff Bells Hakala. (FILED IN SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT ON 11/04/2019 SUBMITTED ATTACHED TO NOTICE OF REMOVAL #1 ) (lh) |
| Filing 6 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendant HAPTX, INC.. (More, Diba) |
| Filing 5 PROOF OF SERVICE filed by DEFENDANT HAPTX, INC., re Corporate Disclosure Statement #4 , Notice of Related Case(s) #3 , Certificate/Notice of Interested Parties #2 , Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 served on December 10, 2019. (More, Diba) |
| Filing 4 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Defendant HAPTX, INC. identifying HAPTX INC. as Corporate Parent. (More, Diba) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Related Case(s) filed by defendant HAPTX, INC.. (More, Diba) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant HAPTX, INC., identifying Plaintiff Bells Hakala. (More, Diba) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from San Luis Obispo, case number 19CV-0662 Receipt No: 0973-24927276 - Fee: $400, filed by defendant HAPTX, INC.. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Diba D. Rastegar) (Attorney Diba R More added to party HAPTX, INC.(pty:dft))(More, Diba) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Bells Hakala v. HaptX, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Bells Hakala | |
| Represented By: | Christina A Humphrey |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: HAPTX, INC. | |
| Represented By: | Diba D Rastegar |
| Represented By: | Debra Ellwood Meppen |
| Represented By: | Laurie DeYoung |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
