Nasrin Mandegar v. Lawrence D. Laity et al
Nasrin Mandegar |
Lawrence D. Laity, Does 1-10, Gwendalee A. Nitta, Joan E. Laity and Joane E. Laity |
2:2019cv10451 |
December 10, 2019 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Cormac J Carney |
Charles F Eick |
Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
42 U.S.C. § 12101 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 28, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 22 ORDER by Judge Cormac J. Carney: Granting #11 , #13 , #15 APPLICATION to Stay Case re Early Mediation ADA Disability Access Litigation as to All Defendants. The ADR proceeding is to be completed no later than 4/27/2020. (iv) |
Filing 21 OPPOSITION re: APPLICATION to Stay Case and Early Mediation re ADA Disability Access Litigation, #13 , APPLICATION to Stay Case and Early Mediation re ADA Disability Access Litigation, #15 , APPLICATION to Stay Case and Early Mediation re ADA Disability Access Litigation, #11 filed by Plaintiff Nasrin Mandegar. (Miller, Bryan) |
Filing 20 NOTICE of Appearance filed by attorney Bryan Barnet Miller on behalf of Plaintiff Nasrin Mandegar (Attorney Bryan Barnet Miller added to party Nasrin Mandegar(pty:pla))(Miller, Bryan) |
Filing 19 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Nasrin Mandegar, upon Defendant Lawrence D. Laity served on 1/16/2020, answer due 2/6/2020. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Gwendalee A Nitta - co-occupant in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by substituted service at home address and by also mailing a copy.Original Summons returned. (Handy, Russell) |
Filing 18 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Nasrin Mandegar, upon Defendant Joane E. Laity served on 1/16/2020, answer due 2/6/2020. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Gwendalee A Nitta - co-occupant in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by substituted service at home address and by also mailing a copy.Original Summons returned. (Handy, Russell) |
Filing 17 ORDER DECLINING TO EXERCISE SUPPLEMENTAL JURISDICION OVER PLAINTIFF'S UNRUH ACT CLAIM #9 by Judge Cormac J. Carney. For the foregoing reasons, the Court declines to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over Plaintiff's Unruh Act claim. This claim is hereby DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for Plaintiff to assert it in state court. The Court retains jurisdiction over Plaintiff's ADA claim. (lom) |
Filing 16 PROOF OF SERVICE filed by Defendant Lawrence D. Laity, re APPLICATION #15 served on 1/10/2020. (iv) |
Filing 15 APPLICATION to Stay Case and Early Mediation re ADA Disability Access Litigation, filed by Defendant Lawrence D. Laity. (iv) |
Filing 14 PROOF OF SERVICE filed by Defendant Joan E. Laity, re APPLICATION to Stay Case and Early Mediation re ADA Disability Access Litigation, #13 served on 1/10/2020. (iv) |
Filing 13 APPLICATION to Stay Case and Early Mediation re ADA Disability Access Litigation, filed by Defendant Joan E. Laity. (iv) |
Filing 12 PROOF OF SERVICE filed by Defendant Gwendalee A. Nitta, re APPLICATION to Stay Case and Early Mediation re ADA Disability Access Litigation, #11 served on 1/10/2020. (iv) |
Filing 11 APPLICATION to Stay Case and Early Mediation re ADA Disability Access Litigation, filed by Defendant Gwendalee A. Nitta. (iv) |
Filing 10 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Nasrin Mandegar, upon Defendant Gwendalee A. Nitta served on 12/20/2019, answer due 1/10/2020. in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by personal service.Original Summons returned. (Handy, Russell) |
Filing 9 RESPONSE filed by Plaintiff Nasrin Mandegarto Minutes of In Chambers Order/Directive - no proceeding held,, Set/Reset Deadlines, #8 (Attachments: #1 Declaration, #2 Declaration, #3 Exhibit 1, #4 Exhibit 2, #5 Proof of service)(Handy, Russell) |
Filing 8 MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE AS TO WHY THIS COURT SHOULD NOT DECLINE TO EXERCISE SUPPLEMENTAL JURISDICTION OVER PLAINTIFF'S UNRUH ACT CLAIM by Judge Cormac J. Carney. The Court orders Plaintiff to show cause as to why it should not decline to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over her Unruh Act claim for similar reasons. Plaintiff shall file a response to this Order to Show Cause by January 3, 2019. (iv) |
Filing 7 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendants Joan E. Laity, Lawrence D. Laity, Gwendalee A. Nitta. (jtil) |
Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (jtil) |
Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Cormac J. Carney and Magistrate Judge Charles F. Eick. (jtil) |
Filing 4 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by plaintiff Nasrin Mandegar. (Handy, Russell) |
Filing 3 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Nasrin Mandegar, (Handy, Russell) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Nasrin Mandegar. (Handy, Russell) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: 0973-24929012 - Fee: $400, filed by plaintiff Nasrin Mandegar. (Attorney Russell C Handy added to party Nasrin Mandegar(pty:pla))(Handy, Russell) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.