Nasrin Mandegar v. Lawrence D. Laity et al
Plaintiff: Nasrin Mandegar
Defendant: Lawrence D. Laity, Does 1-10, Gwendalee A. Nitta, Joan E. Laity and Joane E. Laity
Case Number: 2:2019cv10451
Filed: December 10, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Cormac J Carney
Referring Judge: Charles F Eick
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on January 28, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 28, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 22 ORDER by Judge Cormac J. Carney: Granting #11 , #13 , #15 APPLICATION to Stay Case re Early Mediation ADA Disability Access Litigation as to All Defendants. The ADR proceeding is to be completed no later than 4/27/2020. (iv)
January 16, 2020 Filing 21 OPPOSITION re: APPLICATION to Stay Case and Early Mediation re ADA Disability Access Litigation, #13 , APPLICATION to Stay Case and Early Mediation re ADA Disability Access Litigation, #15 , APPLICATION to Stay Case and Early Mediation re ADA Disability Access Litigation, #11 filed by Plaintiff Nasrin Mandegar. (Miller, Bryan)
January 16, 2020 Filing 20 NOTICE of Appearance filed by attorney Bryan Barnet Miller on behalf of Plaintiff Nasrin Mandegar (Attorney Bryan Barnet Miller added to party Nasrin Mandegar(pty:pla))(Miller, Bryan)
January 16, 2020 Filing 19 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Nasrin Mandegar, upon Defendant Lawrence D. Laity served on 1/16/2020, answer due 2/6/2020. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Gwendalee A Nitta - co-occupant in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by substituted service at home address and by also mailing a copy.Original Summons returned. (Handy, Russell)
January 16, 2020 Filing 18 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Nasrin Mandegar, upon Defendant Joane E. Laity served on 1/16/2020, answer due 2/6/2020. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Gwendalee A Nitta - co-occupant in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by substituted service at home address and by also mailing a copy.Original Summons returned. (Handy, Russell)
January 14, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 17 ORDER DECLINING TO EXERCISE SUPPLEMENTAL JURISDICION OVER PLAINTIFF'S UNRUH ACT CLAIM #9 by Judge Cormac J. Carney. For the foregoing reasons, the Court declines to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over Plaintiff's Unruh Act claim. This claim is hereby DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for Plaintiff to assert it in state court. The Court retains jurisdiction over Plaintiff's ADA claim. (lom)
January 10, 2020 Filing 16 PROOF OF SERVICE filed by Defendant Lawrence D. Laity, re APPLICATION #15 served on 1/10/2020. (iv)
January 10, 2020 Filing 15 APPLICATION to Stay Case and Early Mediation re ADA Disability Access Litigation, filed by Defendant Lawrence D. Laity. (iv)
January 10, 2020 Filing 14 PROOF OF SERVICE filed by Defendant Joan E. Laity, re APPLICATION to Stay Case and Early Mediation re ADA Disability Access Litigation, #13 served on 1/10/2020. (iv)
January 10, 2020 Filing 13 APPLICATION to Stay Case and Early Mediation re ADA Disability Access Litigation, filed by Defendant Joan E. Laity. (iv)
January 10, 2020 Filing 12 PROOF OF SERVICE filed by Defendant Gwendalee A. Nitta, re APPLICATION to Stay Case and Early Mediation re ADA Disability Access Litigation, #11 served on 1/10/2020. (iv)
January 10, 2020 Filing 11 APPLICATION to Stay Case and Early Mediation re ADA Disability Access Litigation, filed by Defendant Gwendalee A. Nitta. (iv)
January 10, 2020 Filing 10 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Nasrin Mandegar, upon Defendant Gwendalee A. Nitta served on 12/20/2019, answer due 1/10/2020. in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by personal service.Original Summons returned. (Handy, Russell)
January 7, 2020 Filing 9 RESPONSE filed by Plaintiff Nasrin Mandegarto Minutes of In Chambers Order/Directive - no proceeding held,, Set/Reset Deadlines, #8 (Attachments: #1 Declaration, #2 Declaration, #3 Exhibit 1, #4 Exhibit 2, #5 Proof of service)(Handy, Russell)
December 17, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 8 MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE AS TO WHY THIS COURT SHOULD NOT DECLINE TO EXERCISE SUPPLEMENTAL JURISDICTION OVER PLAINTIFF'S UNRUH ACT CLAIM by Judge Cormac J. Carney. The Court orders Plaintiff to show cause as to why it should not decline to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over her Unruh Act claim for similar reasons. Plaintiff shall file a response to this Order to Show Cause by January 3, 2019. (iv)
December 13, 2019 Filing 7 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendants Joan E. Laity, Lawrence D. Laity, Gwendalee A. Nitta. (jtil)
December 12, 2019 Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (jtil)
December 12, 2019 Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Cormac J. Carney and Magistrate Judge Charles F. Eick. (jtil)
December 10, 2019 Filing 4 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by plaintiff Nasrin Mandegar. (Handy, Russell)
December 10, 2019 Filing 3 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Nasrin Mandegar, (Handy, Russell)
December 10, 2019 Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Nasrin Mandegar. (Handy, Russell)
December 10, 2019 Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: 0973-24929012 - Fee: $400, filed by plaintiff Nasrin Mandegar. (Attorney Russell C Handy added to party Nasrin Mandegar(pty:pla))(Handy, Russell)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Nasrin Mandegar v. Lawrence D. Laity et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Lawrence D. Laity
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Does 1-10
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Gwendalee A. Nitta
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Joan E. Laity
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Joane E. Laity
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Nasrin Mandegar
Represented By: Russell C Handy
Represented By: Dennis Jay Price, II
Represented By: Phyl Grace
Represented By: Raymond George Ballister, Jr
Represented By: Bryan Barnet Miller
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?