Orlando Garcia v. David Ahdoot et al
| Orlando Garcia |
| Does 1-10, Hermitania Capriel Ixcoy, David Ahdoot and Benito Martinez Ramirez |
| 2:2019cv10454 |
| December 11, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Michael W Fitzgerald |
| Alexander F MacKinnon |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
| 42 U.S.C. § 12101 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 29, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 22
MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE DEFAULT JUDGMENT by Judge Michael W. Fitzgerald. In light of the Default By Clerk #19 #21 entered on January 14, 2020 and January 27, 2020, the Court sets a hearing for Order To Show Cause Re Default Judgment for March 9, 2020 at 11:30 a.m. If a Motion for Default Judgment is filed prior to this hearing, the hearing on the Order To Show Cause will be discharged, and no appearance will be necessary. (iv)
|
| Filing 21 DEFAULT BY CLERK F.R.Civ.P.55(a) as to Benito Martinez Ramirez. (iv) |
| Filing 20 REQUEST for Clerk to Enter Default against defendant Benito Martinez Ramirez filed by Plaintiff Orlando Garcia. (Attachments: #1 Declaration, #2 Proof of service) (Grace, Phyl) |
| Filing 19 DEFAULT BY CLERK F.R.Civ.P.55(a) as to David Ahdoot. (iv) |
| Filing 18 REQUEST for Clerk to Enter Default against defendant David Ahdoot filed by Plaintiff Orlando Garcia. (Attachments: #1 Declaration, #2 Proof of service) (Grace, Phyl) |
|
Filing 17
MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT HERMITANIA CAPRIEL IXCOY'S REQUEST FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT #15 by Judge Michael W. Fitzgerald. The Court GRANTS Defendant's Request. Her response to the Complaint is now no later than February 10, 2020. (lom)
|
|
Filing 16
SELF-REPRESENTATION ORDER by Judge Michael W. Fitzgerald. (lom)
|
| Filing 14 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Orlando Garcia, upon Defendant Hermitania Capriel Ixcoy served on 12/16/2019, answer due 1/6/2020. in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by personal service.Original Summons returned. (Handy, Russell) |
| Filing 15 REQUEST FOR EXTENSION filed by Defendant Hermitania Capriel Ixcoy. (iv) |
| Filing 13 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Orlando Garcia, upon Defendant David Ahdoot served on 12/20/2019, answer due 1/10/2020. in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by personal service.Original Summons returned. (Handy, Russell) |
| Filing 12 RESPONSE filed by Plaintiff Orlando Garciato Minutes of In Chambers Order/Directive - no proceeding held,,, Set/Reset Deadlines,, #9 (Attachments: #1 Declaration, #2 Declaration, #3 Exhibit 1, #4 Exhibit 2)(Handy, Russell) |
| Filing 11 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Orlando Garcia, upon Defendant Benito Martinez Ramirez served on 12/29/2019, answer due 1/21/2020. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Hermitania Capriel - Person in charge in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by substituted service at business address and by also mailing a copy.Original Summons returned. (Handy, Russell) |
| Filing 10 PROOF OF SERVICE filed by plaintiff Orlando Garcia, re Notice to Parties of Court-Directed ADR Program (ADR-8) - optional html form #6 served on 12/18/19. (Handy, Russell) |
|
Filing 9
MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE SUPPLEMENTAL JURISDICTION by Judge Michael W. Fitzgerald Plaintiff is ORDERED to SHOWCAUSE in writing as to why this Court should exercise supplemental jurisdictionover the Unruh Act claim. The Response shall be filed on or before December 31, 2019. Failure to timely or adequately respond to this Order to Show Cause may, without further warning, result in the dismissal of the entire action without prejudice or the Court's declining to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over the Unruh Act claim and the dismissal of that claim pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1367(c). (iv)
|
| Filing 8 NOTICE to Parties Re (ADR-20) ADA Disability Access Litigation/Application for Stay and Early Mediation: PLAINTIFF IS DIRECTED to serve the ADA Packet on Defendant(s) at the same time the summons and complaint are served, if possible. If, upon receipt of this Notice to Parties, Plaintiff has already served Defendant(s), Plaintiff must serve the ADA Packet no later than fourteen (14) days after this Notice to Parties is filed by the Court. Within three (3) days of serving Defendant(s), Plaintiff must file with the Court a proof of service indicating that the ADA Packet was served on Defendant(s). *See Notice for further details.* (smom) |
| Filing 7 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendants David Ahdoot, Hermitania Capriel Ixcoy, Benito Martinez Ramirez. (shb) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (et) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Michael W. Fitzgerald and Magistrate Judge Alexander F. MacKinnon. (et) |
| Filing 4 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by plaintiff Orlando Garcia. (Handy, Russell) |
| Filing 3 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Orlando Garcia, (Handy, Russell) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Orlando Garcia. (Handy, Russell) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: 0973-24929292 - Fee: $400, filed by plaintiff Orlando Garcia. (Attorney Russell C Handy added to party Orlando Garcia(pty:pla))(Handy, Russell) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
