City of Los Angeles v. Federal Aviation Administration
CITY OF LOS ANGELES |
Federal Aviation Administration |
2:2019cv10506 |
December 12, 2019 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Maria A Audero |
Ronald SW Lew |
Freedom of Information Act |
05 U.S.C. ยง 552 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 18, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 13 APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Peter J. Kirsch to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Plaintiff City of Los Angeles (Pro Hac Vice Fee - $400 Fee Paid, Receipt No. 0973-25272798) filed by Plaintiff City of Los Angeles. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Michaelson, David) |
Filing 12 ORDER ON APPLICATION OF NON-RESIDENT ATTORNEY TO APPEAR IN A SPECIFIC CASE PRO HAC VICE by Judge Ronald S.W. Lew: GRANTING #11 Non-Resident Attorney Nathaniel H. Hunt APPLICATION to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Plaintiffs City of Los Angeles, designating David J. Michaelson as local counsel. (lt) |
Filing 11 APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Nathaniel H. Hunt to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Plaintiff City of Los Angeles (Pro Hac Vice Fee - $400 Fee Paid, Receipt No. 0973-25233517) filed by Plaintiff City of Los Angeles. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Michaelson, David) |
Filing 10 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed City of Los Angeles, upon Defendant Federal Aviation Administration served on 12/23/2019, answer due 2/20/2020. Service of the Summons and Complaint were Service was executed in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Due diligence declaration NOT attached. Registered or certified mail return receipt attached. Original Summons returned. (Michaelson, David) |
Filing 9 SERVICE UNDER FRCP 5(b)(2)(D) Executed by Plaintiff City of Los Angeles, upon Defendant Federal Aviation Administration served on 12/19/2019, answer due 2/20/2020. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon the Clerks Office in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (Michaelson, David) |
Filing 8 STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to Federal Aviation Administration answer now due 2/20/2020, re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Defendant Federal Aviation Administration.(Attorney Jason K Axe added to party Federal Aviation Administration(pty:dft))(Axe, Jason) |
Filing 7 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCIES in Attorney Case Opening RE: Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 . The following error(s) was found: The Civil Cover Sheet is attached to the Complaint. It should have been filed and entered separately under its proper event. You are not required to take any action to correct this deficiency unless the Court so directs. (et) |
Filing 6 60 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant Federal Aviation Administration. (et) |
Filing 5 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (et) |
Filing 4 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Ronald S. W. Lew and Magistrate Judge Maria A. Audero. (et) |
Filing 3 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff CITY OF LOS ANGELES, identifying City of Los Angeles. (Michaelson, David) |
Filing 2 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Plaintiff CITY OF LOS ANGELES. (Michaelson, David) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: 0973-24939541 - Fee: $400, filed by Plaintiff CITY OF LOS ANGELES. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibits A-L, #2 Civil Cover Sheet) (Attorney David J Michaelson added to party CITY OF LOS ANGELES(pty:pla))(Michaelson, David) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.