RQ Construction, LLC v. URS Group, Inc. et al
| RQ Construction, LLC |
| Federal Insurance Company and URS Group, Inc. |
| United States of America for the use and benefit of RQ Construction, LLC |
| 2:2019cv10559 |
| December 13, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Rozella A Oliver |
| Otis D Wright |
| Miller Act |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1352 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 7, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 13 Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel: for attorney Joseph L McGeady counsel for Defendant URS Group, Inc.. Adding Joseph L. McGeady as counsel of record for URS Group, Inc. for the reason indicated in the G-123 Notice. Filed by defendant URS Group, Inc.. (Attorney Joseph L McGeady added to party URS Group, Inc.(pty:dft))(McGeady, Joseph) |
Filing 12
ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO RESPOND TO INITIAL COMPLAINT by Judge Otis D. Wright, II, Defendant shall have until February 21, 2020 to respond to Plaintiffs Complaint. IT IS SO ORDERED. (yl)
|
| Filing 11 Joint STIPULATION for Extension of Time to File Answer to 02/21/2020 re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by defendant URS Group, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Kosmo, Frederick) |
| Filing 10 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff RQ Construction, LLC, upon Defendant Federal Insurance Company served on 1/10/2020, answer due 1/31/2020. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon DAISY MONTENEGRO, INTAKE SPECIALIST in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by service on a domestic corporation, unincorporated association, or public entity.Original Summons NOT returned. (Pinto, Richard) |
| Filing 9 THE COURT ORDERS DOCUMENT NO. 8 STRICKEN. Minute order was issued in error. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (sce) TEXT ONLY ENTRY |
|
Filing 8
***STRICKEN***MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS by Judge Otis D. Wright, II: Plaintiff(s) is ordered to show cause in writing no later than January 17, 2020 why this action shouldnot be dismissed for lack of prosecution. The Court will consider the filing of the following, as an appropriate response to this OSC, on or before the above date:Plaintiff's request for entry of default as to the defendant-.URS Group, Inc. In the event both documents are filed before the above date, the answer will take precedence. Answer by the defendant(s).The Order will standsubmitted upon the filing of the response to the Order to Show Cause. Failure to respond to the Court's Order may result in the dismissal of the action. (lc) Modified on 1/15/2020 (sce).*** STRICKEN***
|
| Filing 7 Joint STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to URS Group, Inc. answer now due 1/9/2020, re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by defendant URS Group, Inc..(Attorney Frederick W Kosmo, Jr added to party URS Group, Inc.(pty:dft))(Kosmo, Frederick) |
|
Filing 6
MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS by Judge Otis D Wright, II: This action has been assigned to the calendar of Judge Otis D. Wright II. Counsel are STRONGLY encouraged to review the Central Districts website for additional information.The parties may consent to proceed before a Magistrate Judge appearing on the voluntary consent list. PLEASE refer to Local Rule 79-5 for the submission of CIVIL ONLY SEALED DOCUMENTS. CRIMINAL SEALED DOCUMENTS will remain the same. all proposed sealed documents must be submitted via e-mail to the Judges Chambers email address, EXCLUDING those submitted by pro se parties and IN CAMERA filings, which shall continue to comply with Local Rule 79-5.1. Please refer to the Judges procedures and schedules for detailed instructions for submission of sealed documents. (lc)
|
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCIES in Attorney Case Opening RE: Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 . The following error(s) was found: Other error(s) with document(s): Attachments No. 1 Civil Cover Sheet, No. 2 Supplement Summons, and No. 3 Supplement Notice of Interested Parties should not have been attached to Docket Entry No. 1. Each document should have been filed separately. You are not required to take any action to correct this deficiency unless the Court so directs. (lh) |
| Filing 4 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 as to Defendants Federal Insurance Company, URS Group, Inc. (lh) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (lh) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Otis D. Wright, II and Magistrate Judge Rozella A. Oliver. (lh) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: 0973-24949059 - Fee: $400, filed by Plaintiff United States of America for the use and benefit of RQ Construction, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Case Cover Sheet, #2 Supplement Summons, #3 Supplement Notice of Interested Parties) (Attorney Richard J Pinto, II added to party United States of America for the use and benefit of RQ Construction, LLC(pty:bkmov))(Pinto, Richard) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
