William Sardinas v. L.J. Milusnic
William Sardinas |
L.J. Milusnic |
2:2019cv10706 |
December 18, 2019 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Michael W Fitzgerald |
Kenly Kiya Kato |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 17, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE of Assistant United States Attorney JohnPaul LeCedre on behalf of Respondent L.J. Milusnic. Assistant United States Attorney Assistant 2241-194 US Attorney LA-CV terminated. (Attorney Johnpaul Lecedre added to party L.J. Milusnic(pty:res))(Lecedre, Johnpaul) |
Filing 3 ORDER REQUIRING Respondent to file a statement of position regarding the Court's jurisdiction over the Petition in this matter by Magistrate Judge Kenly Kiya Kato. Respondent L.J. MILUSNIC, WARDEN file a statement of position not later than 2/27/2020. At the time the statement of position is filed, Respondent shall lodge with the court all records bearing on Respondent's contention in this regard, including any state habeas petitions and/or court orders or decisions. Petitioner may file a single reply responding to matters raised in the statement of position within fourteen (14) days of the date of service thereof. Unless otherwise ordered by the court, the issue shall be deemed submitted on the day following the date petitioner's reply is due. Notice: The court has issued a ruling on preliminary review. Pursuant to the Agreement on Acceptance of Service between the Clerk of Court and the United States Attorneys Office, this Notice constitutes service under Fed. R. Civ. P. 4. (dts) (Attachments: #1 Petition-1, #2 CONSENT form) (dts) Modified on 1/28/2020 (dts). (Main Document 3 replaced on 1/28/2020) (dts). (Attachment 2 replaced on 1/28/2020) (dts). |
Filing 2 NOTICE OF REFERENCE to a U.S. Magistrate Judge. This case has been assigned to the calendar of the Honorable District Judge Michael W. Fitzgerald and referred to Magistrate Judge Kenly Kiya Kato, who is authorized to consider preliminary matters and conduct all further hearings as may be appropriate or necessary. Pursuant to Local Rule 83-2.4, the Court must be notified within five (5) days of any address change. See notice for additional details. (car) |
Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus by a Person In Federal Custody (28:2241) Case assigned to Judge Michael W. Fitzgerald and referred to Magistrate Judge Kenly Kiya Kato.(Filing fee $ 5 FEE DUE), filed by Petitioner William Sardinas. (car) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: William Sardinas v. L.J. Milusnic | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner: William Sardinas | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Respondent: L.J. Milusnic | |
Represented By: | Assistant 2241-194 US Attorney LA-CV |
Represented By: | Johnpaul Lecedre |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.