David Clifford v. Ford Motor Company
Plaintiff: David Clifford
Defendant: Ford Motor Company
Case Number: 2:2019cv10736
Filed: December 19, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Andre Birotte
Referring Judge: Frederick F Mumm
Nature of Suit: Contract Product Liability
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Notice of Removal - Breach of Contract
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on April 1, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
April 1, 2021 Filing 16 Joint STIPULATION to Dismiss Case pursuant to FRCP RULE 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) filed by Defendant Ford Motor Company.(Hugret, Spencer)
December 23, 2019 Filing 15 Letter to Counsel regarding MDL Transfer-In. (car)
December 23, 2019 Filing 12 ORIGINAL file, certified copy of transfer order and docket sheet received from California Northern
December 20, 2019 Case transferred to the Central District of California via ECF. (mclS, COURT STAFF) [Transferred from California Northern on 12/23/2019.]
December 19, 2019 Filing 14 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Andre Birotte Jr and Magistrate Judge Frederick F. Mumm. (car)
December 19, 2019 Filing 13 Copy of Conditional Transfer Order - CTO-35 received from the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation. Transfer order filed by MDL panel on 12/19/19 regarding transfer of Case No. 3:19-cv-08008-CRB from U.S. District Court California Northern District (San Francisco). Case assigned to Judge Andre Birotte Jr for the purpose of pretrial proceedings. Case consolidated with 2:18-ml-2814-AB-FFMx. (car)
December 19, 2019 Filing 11 CONDITIONAL TRANSFER ORDER (CTO-35) by MDL Panel transferring case to the Central District of California. (mclS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/19/2019) [Transferred from California Northern on 12/23/2019.]
December 12, 2019 Filing 10 CLERK'S NOTICE: A Joint Case Management Statement due by 2/28/2020. Initial Case Management Conference set for 3/3/2020 at 8:30 AM in San Francisco, Courtroom 06, 17th Floor. (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.) (lsS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/12/2019) [Transferred from California Northern on 12/23/2019.]
December 12, 2019 Filing 9 Case REASSIGNED to Judge Charles R. Breyer. Notice: The assigned judge participates in the Cameras in the Courtroom Pilot Project. See General Order No. 65 and http://cand.uscourts.gov/cameras. Magistrate Judge Susan Van Keulen no longer assigned to case. (bwS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/12/2019) [Transferred from California Northern on 12/23/2019.]
December 12, 2019 Filing 8 This case will be randomly reassigned to a District Judge outside the San Jose Division pursuant to the Caseload Rebalancing Pilot Program approved by the Court effective March 1, 2018. For information, visit our web page at #http://cand.uscourts.gov/news/225. (bwS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/12/2019) [Transferred from California Northern on 12/23/2019.]
December 12, 2019 Filing 7 CLERK'S NOTICE OF IMPENDING REASSIGNMENT TO A U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE: The Clerk of this Court will now randomly reassign this case to a District Judge because either (1) a party has not consented to the jurisdiction of a Magistrate Judge, or (2) time is of the essence in deciding a pending judicial action for which the necessary consents to Magistrate Judge jurisdiction have not been secured. You will be informed by separate notice of the district judge to whom this case is reassigned. ALL HEARING DATES PRESENTLY SCHEDULED BEFORE THE CURRENT MAGISTRATE JUDGE ARE VACATED AND SHOULD BE RE-NOTICED FOR HEARING BEFORE THE JUDGE TO WHOM THIS CASE IS REASSIGNED. This is a text only docket entry; there is no document associated with this notice. (cfeS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/12/2019) [Transferred from California Northern on 12/23/2019.]
December 11, 2019 Filing 6 CONSENT/DECLINATION to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Ford Motor Company.. (Hugret, Spencer) (Filed on 12/11/2019) [Transferred from California Northern on 12/23/2019.]
December 10, 2019 Filing 5 Initial Case Management Scheduling Order with ADR Deadlines: Case Management Statement due by 3/3/2020. Initial Case Management Conference set for 3/10/2020 09:30 AM in San Jose, Courtroom 6, 4th Floor. (cv, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/10/2019) [Transferred from California Northern on 12/23/2019.]
December 9, 2019 Filing 4 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Susan van Keulen. Counsel for plaintiff or the removing party is responsible for serving the Complaint or Notice of Removal, Summons and the assigned judge's standing orders and all other new case documents upon the opposing parties. For information, visit E-Filing A New Civil Case at http://cand.uscourts.gov/ecf/caseopening.Standing orders can be downloaded from the court's web page at www.cand.uscourts.gov/judges. Upon receipt, the summons will be issued and returned electronically. Counsel is required to send chambers a copy of the initiating documents pursuant to L.R. 5-1(e)(7). A scheduling order will be sent by Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) within two business days. Consent/Declination due by 12/23/2019. (mbcS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/9/2019) [Transferred from California Northern on 12/23/2019.]
December 6, 2019 Filing 1 ANSWER to Complaint (Notice of Removal) byFord Motor Company. (cv, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/6/2019) [Transferred from California Northern on 12/23/2019.]
December 6, 2019 Filing 3 NOTICE of Pendency of Other Action Involving Same Patent by Ford Motor Company (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Certificate/Proof of Service)(Hugret, Spencer) (Filed on 12/6/2019) [Transferred from California Northern on 12/23/2019.]
December 6, 2019 Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by Spencer Peter Hugret (Attachments: #1 Certificate/Proof of Service)(Hugret, Spencer) (Filed on 12/6/2019) [Transferred from California Northern on 12/23/2019.]
December 6, 2019 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Santa Clara Superior Court. Their case number is 19CV357686. (Filing fee $400 receipt number 0971-13956169). Filed byFord Motor Company. (Attachments: #1 Declaration Of Spencer P. Hugret In Support Of Ford Motor Companys Notice Of Removal Of Action Pursuant To 28 U.S.C. 1332, 1441, 1446, #2 Declaration Of Molly J. Mrowka In Support Of Ford Motor Companys Notice Of Removal Of Action Pursuant To 28 U.S.C. 1332, 1441, 1446, #3 Exhibit A, #4 Exhibit B, #5 Exhibit C, #6 Exhibit D, #7 Exhibit E, #8 Exhibit F, #9 Defendant Ford Motor Companys Certification Of Interested Entities Or Persons, #10 Civil Cover Sheet, #11 Certificate/Proof of Service)(Hugret, Spencer) (Filed on 12/6/2019) [Transferred from California Northern on 12/23/2019.]

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: David Clifford v. Ford Motor Company
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Ford Motor Company
Represented By: Hailey Rogerson
Represented By: Spencer Peter Hugret
Represented By: Hailey Marie Rogerson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: David Clifford
Represented By: David N Barry
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?