Robert C. Woods v. Marion E. Spearman
Petitioner: Mr. Robert C. Woods
Respondent: Marion E. Spearman
Case Number: 2:2019cv10804
Filed: December 20, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: John A Kronstadt
Referring Judge: Karen E Scott
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 11, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 11, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 24 Order by Judge John A. Kronstadt denying certificate of appealability. (mat)
September 11, 2020 Filing 23 JUDGMENT by Judge John A. Kronstadt. Pursuant to the Court's Order Accepting Report and Recommendation of U.S. Magistrate Judge, IT IS ADJUDGED that the Petition is dismissed with prejudice. #22 (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (es)
September 11, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 22 ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE by Judge John A. Kronstadt. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition (Dkt. 1), the other records on file herein, and the Report and Recommendation of the U.S. Magistrate Judge (Dkt. 20). Plaintiff indicated that he does not object to the Report and Recommendation. (Dkt. 21.) The Court accepts the report, findings, and recommendations of the Magistrate Judge. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Judgment be entered denying the Petition on the merits. #20 (es)
September 1, 2020 Filing 21 Notice of OBJECTIONS, #20 filed by petitioner Robert C. Woods.(es)
August 5, 2020 Filing 20 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION issued by Magistrate Judge Karen E. Scott #1 #14 . IT IS THEREFORE RECOMMENDED that the District Court issue an Order (1) approving and accepting this RR, (2) denying Petitioner's motion for a stay, and (3) directing that judgment be entered denying the Petition on the merits. (jdo)
August 5, 2020 Filing 19 NOTICE OF FILING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION by Magistrate Judge Karen E. Scott. Objections to R&R due by 8/28/2020. (jdo)
June 24, 2020 Filing 18 REPLY IN SUPPORT OF A MOTION NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus Memorandum of Points and Authorities #11 AND OPPOSITION TO REQUEST FOR STAY filed by Respondent Marion E. Spearman. (Estaville, Toni)
May 26, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 17 ORDER by Magistrate Judge Karen E. Scott: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Respondent is granted to and including June 26, 2020, to file a Reply in Support of the Motion to Dismiss the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus. #16 (es)
May 22, 2020 Filing 16 First EX PARTE APPLICATION for Extension of Time to File a Reply in Support of Motion to Dismiss Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Respondent Marion E. Spearman. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order Granting Respondent to and including June 26, 2020, to File a Reply in Support of Motion to Dismiss.) (Estaville, Toni)
April 27, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 15 MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS by Magistrate Judge Karen E. Scott: Order Requiring Respondent to File a Reply in Support of Motion to Dismiss on or before May 27,2020 #11 .The reply shall address whether Petitioner has met therequirements for a Rhines stay. (lc)
April 23, 2020 Filing 14 OPPOSITION to Motion to Dismiss; Opposition to Motion to Stay #11 filed by Petitioner Robert C. Woods. (es)
March 25, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 13 MINUTE ORDER (IN CHAMBERS): Order Requiring Petitioner to Respond to Motion to Dismiss Based on Lack of Exhaustion by Magistrate Judge Karen E. Scott: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Petitioner should file a response to Respondent's motion to dismiss on or before April 24, 2020. Petitioner should respond to the motion by doing one of the following: *See order for details.* (es)
February 5, 2020 Filing 12 NOTICE OF LODGING filed Lodged Document ("LD") Numbered LD-1 through LD-6 re NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus Memorandum of Points and Authorities #11 (Attachments: #1 LD-1, #2 LD-2, #3 LD-3, #4 LD-4, #5 LD-5, #6 LD-6)(Estaville, Toni)
February 5, 2020 Filing 11 NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus Memorandum of Points and Authorities filed by Respondent Marion E. Spearman. (Estaville, Toni)
January 21, 2020 Filing 10 CONSENT TO PROCEED before Magistrate Judge, in accordance with Title 28 Section 636(c) and F.R.CIV.P 73(b), filed by Petitioner Robert C. Woods. (sbou)
January 16, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 9 MINUTE ORDER (IN CHAMBERS) Order re Petitioner's Declaration in Support of Request to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (Dkt. 8) by Magistrate Judge Karen E. Scott: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, to the extent Petitioner is seeking leave to proceed without prepayment of the filing fee, that request is denied as moot because Petitioner has already paid the filing fee. To the extent Petitioner's financial status becomes relevant for some other purpose, such as appointment of counsel, the Court will consider the declaration submitted by Petitioner. (See order for further details.) (es)
January 15, 2020 Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance filed by attorney Toni R Johns Estaville on behalf of Respondent Marion E. Spearman (Attorney Toni R Johns Estaville added to party Marion E. Spearman(pty:res))(Estaville, Toni)
January 13, 2020 Filing 8 DECLARATION IN SUPPORT OF REQUEST TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS filed by Petitioner Robert C. Woods. (sbou)
January 6, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER REQUIRING RESPONSE TO HABEAS PETITION by Magistrate Judge Karen E. Scott. Notice: The court has issued a ruling on preliminary review. Pursuant to the Agreement on Acceptance of Service between the Clerk of Court and the California Attorney General's Office, this Notice constitutes service under Fed. R. Civ. P. 4. (Attachments: #1 Petition, #2 Petition Memorandum, #3 Consent Form CV11B) (jdo)
January 2, 2020 Filing 4 FINANCIAL ENTRY: Received $5.00 into the registry of the Court from Robert Woods. Re: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (2254) #1 . Receipt number LA199868. (Fe)
December 20, 2019 Filing 3 NOTICE OF REFERENCE to a U.S. Magistrate Judge. This case has been assigned to the calendar of the Honorable District Judge John A. Kronstadt and referred to Magistrate Judge Karen E. Scott, who is authorized to consider preliminary matters and conduct all further hearings as may be appropriate or necessary. Pursuant to Local Rule 83-2.4, the Court must be notified within five (5) days of any address change. See notice for additional details. (Attachments: #1 CV-111 and CV-27) (ghap)
December 20, 2019 Filing 2 MEMORANDUM of Points and Authorities in Support filed by Petitioner Robert C. Woods. (ghap)
December 20, 2019 Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus by a Person In State Custody (28:2254) Case assigned to Judge John A. Kronstadt and referred to Magistrate Judge Karen E. Scott.(Filing fee $ 5: FEE DUE.), filed by petitioner Robert C. Woods. (ghap)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Robert C. Woods v. Marion E. Spearman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Marion E. Spearman
Represented By: Toni R Johns Estaville
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Mr. Robert C. Woods
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?