Jorge A. Hernandez v. S. Frauenheom
| Jorge A. Hernandez |
| S Frauenheom |
| 2:2019cv10892 |
| December 26, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Andre Birotte |
| Alicia G Rosenberg |
| Christina A Snyder |
| Karen L Stevenson |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 9, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 13
ORDER RE TRANSFER PURSUANT TO GENERAL ORDER 19-03-Related Case- filed. Related Case No: 2:19-cv-02727 AB(KS). Case transferred from Judge Christina A. Snyder to Judge Andre Birotte Jr for all further proceedings. The case number will now reflect the initials of the transferee Judge 2:19-cv-10892 AB(KS). Signed by Judge Andre Birotte Jr (rn)
|
|
Filing 12
ORDER RE TRANSFER PURSUANT TO Local Rule 83-1.3.1 and General Order 19-03 -Related Case- filed. Related Case No: 2:18-cv-10201 KS. Case referred from Magistrate Judge Alicia G. Rosenberg to Magistrate Judge Karen L. Stevenson for 194. The case number will now read as follows: 2:19-cv-10892 CAS(KS). Signed by Magistrate Judge Karen L. Stevenson. (rn)
|
| Filing 11 NOTICE of Related Case(s) filed by Respondent S Frauenheom. NOTICE OF RELATED CASE Related Case(s): CV18-10201-AB (KS), CV19-02727-AB (KS), CV19-07501-AB (KS) (Nguyen, Taylor) |
| Filing 10 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE of California Attorney General Office Taylor Nguyen, Deputy Attorney General, on behalf of Respondent S Frauenheom. California Attorney General Julie Ann Harris terminated. (Attorney Taylor T Nguyen added to party S Frauenheom(pty:res))(Nguyen, Taylor) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE of California Attorney General Office Julie A. Harris on behalf of respondent S Frauenheom. (Attorney Julie Ann Harris added to party S Frauenheom(pty:res))(Harris, Julie) |
|
Filing 8
MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER RE PETITIONER'S MOTION FOR APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL #2 by Magistrate Judge Alicia G. Rosenberg. Accordingly, Petitioner's motion for appointment of counsel is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Nothing in this Order is intended to preclude Petitioner from retaining counsel on his own. (See Order for Further Details) (kl)
|
|
Filing 7
ORDER REQUIRING A RESPONSE/ANSWER TO PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS (28 U.S.C. 2254) by Magistrate Judge Alicia G. Rosenberg. Within 14 days of the date of this Order, Respondent shall serve and file a Notice of Appearance notifying the court of the name of the attorney who will have principal charge of the case, together with the address where the attorney may be served, and the attorneys telephone and fax number. Respondent S Frauenheom file Answer to the Petition not later than 3/23/2020. Motions to Dismiss shall be filed by 3/6/2020. Notice: The court has issued a ruling on preliminary review. Pursuant to the Agreement on Acceptance of Service between the Clerk of Court and the California Attorney Generals Office, this Notice constitutes service under Fed. R. Civ. P. 4. (See Order for Further Details) (Attachments: #1 Petition) (kl)
|
|
Filing 6
MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER RE PETITIONER'S REQUEST TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS #5 IS GRANTED by Magistrate Judge Alicia G. Rosenberg. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus by a Person in State Custody may be filed without prepayment of the filing fee. (See Order for Further Details) (kl)
|
| Filing 5 REQUEST for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis, Declaration in Support filed by Petitioner Jorge A. Hernandez. (hr) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE OF REFERENCE to a U.S. Magistrate Judge. This case has been assigned to the calendar of the Honorable District Judge Christina A. Snyder and referred to Magistrate Judge Alicia G. Rosenberg, who is authorized to consider preliminary matters and conduct all further hearings as may be appropriate or necessary. Pursuant to Local Rule 83-2.4, the Court must be notified within five (5) days of any address change. See notice for additional details. (Attachments: #1 CV111) (jtil) |
| Filing 3 ELECTION REGARDING CONSENT to Proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge Declined, in accordance with Title 28 Section 636c filed by Petitioner Jorge A. Hernandez. The Petitioner does not consent. (jtil) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Appointment of Counsel filed by Petitioner Jorge A. Hernandez. (jtil) |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus by a Person In State Custody (28:2254), filed by Petitioner Jorge A. Hernandez. Case assigned to Judge Christina A. Snyder and referred to Magistrate Judge Alicia G. Rosenberg. (jtil) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Jorge A. Hernandez v. S. Frauenheom | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: S Frauenheom | |
| Represented By: | Taylor T Nguyen |
| Represented By: | Julie Ann Harris |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Jorge A. Hernandez | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
