Alan Janowitz v. UCLA Health, et al
| Alan Janowitz |
| THE REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, a public entity, Does 1-10 inclusive, The Regents of the University of California and UCLA Health |
| 2:2019cv10918 |
| December 27, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| R Gary Klausner |
| Rozella A Oliver |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 10, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 11
ORDER SETTING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Judge R. Gary Klausner. A Scheduling Conference has been placed on calendar for May 11, 2020 at 9:00 a.m. The Conference will be held pursuant to F.R.Civ. P. 16(b). Trial counsel must be present and there are no telephonic appearances. Counsel are ordered to file a joint statement providing a brief factual summary of the case, including the claims being asserted. The parties are reminded of their obligations to disclose information and confer on a discovery plan not later than 21 days prior to the scheduling conference, and to file a joint statement with the Court not later than 14 days after they confer, as required by F.R. Civ.P. 26 and the Local Rules of this Court. Failure to comply may lead to the imposition of sanctions. Plaintiff's counsel is directed to give notice of the scheduling conference to each party that makes an initial appearance in the action after this date. Rule 26 Meeting Report due by 5/4/2020. (sw)
|
|
Filing 10
STANDING ORDER REGARDING NEWLY ASSIGNED CASES by Judge R. Gary Klausner. (sw)
|
|
Filing 9
ORDER TO REASSIGN CASE due to self-recusal pursuant to General Order 19-03 by Judge Cormac J. Carney. Case transferred from Judge Cormac J. Carney to the calendar of Judge R. Gary Klausner for all further proceedings. Case number now reads as 2:19-cv-10918 RGK(RAOx). (rn)
|
| Filing 8 ANSWER to Complaint - (Discovery) filed by Defendant The Regents of the University of California.(Dietz, Matthew) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (esa) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Cormac J. Carney and Magistrate Judge Rozella A. Oliver. (esa) |
| CONFORMED COPY OF COMPLAINT against defendants Does, UCLA Health, Jury Demand, filed by plaintiff Alan Janowitz. (filed in state court 11/21/19, submitted as document 1, attachment 1) (esa) |
| Filing 5 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE filed by Defendant THE REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, a public entity, re Civil Cover Sheet (CV-71) #2 , Certificate/Notice of Interested Parties #3 , Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 , Jury Demand #4 served on 12/27/2019. (Dietz, Matthew) |
| Filing 4 DEMAND for Jury Trial filed by Defendant THE REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, a public entity.. (Dietz, Matthew) |
| Filing 3 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant THE REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, a public entity, (Dietz, Matthew) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendant THE REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, a public entity. (Dietz, Matthew) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Los Angeles Superior Court, case number 19SMCV02040 Receipt No: 0973-25026344 - Fee: $400, filed by d THE REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, a public entity. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Complaint) (Attorney Matthew William Dietz added to party THE REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, a public entity(pty:dft))(Dietz, Matthew) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
