Dashawn Crosby v. King Henry VIII, Inc et al
| Dashawn Crosby |
| Doe Managers 1-3, King Henry VIII, Inc, Samantha Sanson, Does 4-100, Renata Heindl and Samantha Sanson Consulting, Inc. |
| 2:2019cv10921 |
| December 27, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Consuelo B Marshall |
| Michael R Wilner |
| Labor: Fair Standards |
| 29 U.S.C. § 201 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 2, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 22
MINUTE IN CHAMBERS ORDER RE DKT NOS. 15, 17, 21 by Judge Consuelo B. Marshall: NOTICE OF AUTOMATIC STAY OF PROCEEDINGS AND NOTICE OF PENDENCY OF OTHER ACTIONS OR PROCEEDINGS filed by DEFENDANTS King Henry VIII, Inc, Samantha Sanson Consulting, Inc., Samantha Sanson: Pursuant to 11 USC Sect 362(a), further proceedings against Defendant SSCI are automatically stayed. However, if a party seeks to stay this action in its entirety, the Court orders that party to file a noticed motion in compliance with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and the local rules. Because King Henry failed to raise its requests for a stay in a noticed motion, the Court declines to address that issue here. NOTICE OF STATEMENT OF DEATH OF RENATA HEINDL: Here a party or the decedent's successor or representative must move to substitute Defendant Heindl no later than May 10, 2020, in accordance with Fed.R.Civ.P. 25(a). If the deceased party is not substituted before that date, the Court must dismiss the claim against Defendant Heindl. (shb)
|
| Filing 21 STATEMENT NOTICE OF STATEMENT OF DEATH OF RENATA HEINDL filed by Defendant King Henry VIII, Inc re: Service of Summons and Complaint Returned Executed (21 days), #11 . (Daley, Sean) |
| Filing 20 AMENDED ANSWER to Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by DEFENDANT King Henry VIII, Inc. (Daley, Sean) |
|
Filing 19
MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Judge Consuelo B. Marshall. Scheduling Conference set for 4/28/2020 at 10:00 AM before Judge Consuelo B. Marshall. (ys)
|
| Filing 18 ANSWER to Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Defendant King Henry VIII, Inc.(Daley, Sean) |
| Filing 17 NOTICE OF PENDENCY OF OTHER ACTIONS OR PROCEEDINGS filed by DEFENDANT King Henry VIII, Inc. (Daley, Sean) |
| Filing 16 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by DEFENDANT King Henry VIII, Inc, identifying Plaintiff, Dashawn Crosby; Defendant, King Henry VIII, Inc.; Defendant, Samantha Sanson; and Defendant, Samantha Sanson Consulting, Inc.. (Daley, Sean) |
| Filing 15 NOTICE OF AUTOMATIC STAY OF PROCEEDINGS filed by DEFENDANTS King Henry VIII, Inc, Samantha Sanson Consulting, Inc., Samantha Sanson. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Daley, Sean) |
| Filing 14 Joint STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to King Henry VIII, Inc answer now due 2/6/2020; Renata Heindl answer now due 2/10/2020, re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by DEFENDANT King Henry VIII, Inc.(Attorney Sean Francis Daley added to party King Henry VIII, Inc(pty:dft))(Daley, Sean) |
| Filing 13 NOTICE OF DISMISSAL filed by Plaintiff Dashawn Crosby pursuant to FRCP 41a(1) without prejudice as to Samantha Sanson Consulting, Inc.. (Kristensen, John) |
|
Filing 12
STANDING ORDER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Consuelo B. Marshall. READ THIS ORDER CAREFULLY. It controls this case and may differ in some respects from the Local Rules. (ys)
|
| Filing 11 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Dashawn Crosby, upon Defendant Renata Heindl served on 1/5/2020, answer due 1/27/2020. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Renata Heindl in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by substituted service at home address and by also mailing a copy.Original Summons NOT returned. (Kristensen, John) |
| Filing 10 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Dashawn Crosby, upon Defendant King Henry VIII, Inc served on 1/3/2020, answer due 1/24/2020. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon King Henry VIII, INC., in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by substituted service at business address and by also mailing a copy.Original Summons NOT returned. (Kristensen, John) |
| Filing 9 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendants Renata Heindl, King Henry VIII, Inc, Samantha Sanson Consulting, Inc., Samantha Sanson. (Attachments: #1 King Henry, #2 SSConsulting, #3 SSanson) (jtil) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Consuelo B. Marshall and Magistrate Judge Michael R. Wilner. (jtil) |
| Filing 7 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Dashawn Crosby. (Kristensen, John) |
| Filing 6 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Dashawn Crosby. (Kristensen, John) |
| Filing 5 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Dashawn Crosby. (Kristensen, John) |
| Filing 4 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Dashawn Crosby. (Kristensen, John) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Dashawn Crosby, (Kristensen, John) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Dashawn Crosby. (Kristensen, John) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: 0973-25027149 - Fee: $400, filed by Plaintiff Dashawn Crosby. (Attorney John P Kristensen added to party Dashawn Crosby(pty:pla))(Kristensen, John) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
