Lydia Olson et al v. State of California et al Featured Case

Plaintiffs Lydia Olson, Miguel Perez, Postmastes Inc. and Uber Technologies, Inc. sued the State of California and Xavier Becerra, in his capacity as the Attorney General of California, alleging that California Assembly Bill 5 was unconstitutional in that it violated the Equal Protection Clause of the 14th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution by drawing irrational distinctions between independent service providers and non-independent service providers that perform substantially the same work.

Plaintiff: Postmates Inc., Miguel Perez, Uber Technologies, Inc. and Lydia Olson
Defendant: Xavier Becerra, State of California and John Doe
Case Number: 2:2019cv10956
Filed: December 30, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Dolly M Gee
Referring Judge: Rozella A Oliver
Nature of Suit: Constitutional - State Statute
Cause of Action: 28:2201
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on January 8, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 8, 2020 Filing 20 DECLARATION of Brandon J. Stoker in Support of NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION for Preliminary Injunction re enjoining enforcement of any provision of California Assembly Bill 5 (2019) against Plaintiffs pending final judgment . Motion #14 filed by Plaintiffs Lydia Olson, Miguel Perez, Postmates Inc., Uber Technologies, Inc.. (Kapur, Theano)
January 8, 2020 Filing 19 DECLARATION of Justin McCrary in Support of NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION for Preliminary Injunction re enjoining enforcement of any provision of California Assembly Bill 5 (2019) against Plaintiffs pending final judgment . Motion #14 filed by Plaintiffs Lydia Olson, Miguel Perez, Postmates Inc., Uber Technologies, Inc.. (Kapur, Theano)
January 8, 2020 Filing 18 DECLARATION of Brad Rosenthal in Support of NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION for Preliminary Injunction re enjoining enforcement of any provision of California Assembly Bill 5 (2019) against Plaintiffs pending final judgment . Motion #14 filed by Plaintiffs Lydia Olson, Miguel Perez, Postmates Inc., Uber Technologies, Inc.. (Kapur, Theano)
January 8, 2020 Filing 17 DECLARATION of Patricia Cartes Andres in Support of NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION for Preliminary Injunction re enjoining enforcement of any provision of California Assembly Bill 5 (2019) against Plaintiffs pending final judgment . Motion #14 filed by Plaintiffs Lydia Olson, Miguel Perez, Postmates Inc., Uber Technologies, Inc.. (Kapur, Theano)
January 8, 2020 Filing 16 DECLARATION of Miguel Perez in Support of NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION for Preliminary Injunction re enjoining enforcement of any provision of California Assembly Bill 5 (2019) against Plaintiffs pending final judgment . Motion #14 filed by Plaintiffs Lydia Olson, Miguel Perez, Postmates Inc., Uber Technologies, Inc.. (Kapur, Theano)
January 8, 2020 Filing 15 DECLARATION of Lydia Olson in Support of NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION for Preliminary Injunction re enjoining enforcement of any provision of California Assembly Bill 5 (2019) against Plaintiffs pending final judgment . Motion #14 filed by Plaintiffs Lydia Olson, Miguel Perez, Postmates Inc., Uber Technologies, Inc.. (Kapur, Theano)
January 8, 2020 Filing 14 NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION for Preliminary Injunction re enjoining enforcement of any provision of California Assembly Bill 5 (2019) against Plaintiffs pending final judgment . Motion filed by Plaintiffs Lydia Olson, Miguel Perez, Postmates Inc., Uber Technologies, Inc.. Motion set for hearing on 2/7/2020 at 02:00 PM before Judge Dolly M. Gee. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum of Points and Authorities, #2 Proposed Order) (Kapur, Theano)
January 8, 2020 Filing 13 NOTICE of Appearance filed by attorney Theano Evangelis Kapur on behalf of Plaintiffs Lydia Olson, Miguel Perez, Postmates Inc., Uber Technologies, Inc. (Kapur, Theano)
January 8, 2020 Filing 12 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Uber Technologies, Inc., Lydia Olson, Postmates Inc., Miguel Perez, upon Defendant Xavier Becerra served on 1/2/2020, answer due 1/23/2020; State of California served on 1/2/2020, answer due 1/23/2020. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon N. Singh, Officer in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by personal service.Original Summons NOT returned. (Kapur, Theano)
January 8, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 11 INITIAL STANDING ORDER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Dolly M. Gee. (kti)
January 8, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ORDER RE TRANSFER PURSUANT TO GENERAL ORDER 19-03 (Related Case) filed. Transfer of case declined by Judge Philip S. Gutierrez, for the reasons set forth on this order. Related Case No. 2:19-cv-10645 PSG(KSx) (rn)
January 7, 2020 Filing 9 Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel: for attorney Jose A Zelidon-Zepeda counsel for Defendant Xavier Becerra. Adding Jose A. Zelidon-Zepeda as counsel of record for Attorney General Xavier Becerra for the reason indicated in the G-123 Notice. Filed by Defendant Jose A. Zelidon-Zepeda. (Attorney Jose A Zelidon-Zepeda added to party Xavier Becerra(pty:dft))(Zelidon-Zepeda, Jose)
December 30, 2019 Filing 8 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 as to Defendants Xavier Becerra, State of California. (car)
December 30, 2019 Filing 7 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (car)
December 30, 2019 Filing 6 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Dolly M. Gee and Magistrate Judge Rozella A. Oliver. (car)
December 30, 2019 Filing 5 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Plaintiffs Lydia Olson, Miguel Perez, Postmates Inc., Uber Technologies, Inc.. (Kapur, Theano)
December 30, 2019 Filing 4 NOTICE of Related Case(s) filed by Plaintiffs Lydia Olson, Miguel Perez, Postmates Inc., Uber Technologies, Inc.. Related Case(s): 2:19-cv-10645-PSG-KS (Kapur, Theano)
December 30, 2019 Filing 3 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiffs Lydia Olson, Miguel Perez, Postmates Inc., Uber Technologies, Inc., (Kapur, Theano)
December 30, 2019 Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiffs Lydia Olson, Miguel Perez, Postmates Inc., Uber Technologies, Inc.. (Kapur, Theano)
December 30, 2019 Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: 0973-25035597 - Fee: $400, filed by Plaintiffs Uber Technologies, Inc., Lydia Olson, Postmates Inc., Miguel Perez. (Attorney Theano Evangelis Kapur added to party Lydia Olson(pty:pla), Attorney Theano Evangelis Kapur added to party Miguel Perez(pty:pla), Attorney Theano Evangelis Kapur added to party Postmates Inc.(pty:pla), Attorney Theano Evangelis Kapur added to party Uber Technologies, Inc.(pty:pla))(Kapur, Theano)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Lydia Olson et al v. State of California et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Xavier Becerra
Represented By: Jose A Zelidon-Zepeda
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: State of California
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: John Doe
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Postmates Inc.
Represented By: Heather Lynn Richardson
Represented By: Blaine H Evanson
Represented By: Dhananjay S Manthripragada
Represented By: Theano Evangelis Kapur
Represented By: Joshua S Lipshutz
Represented By: Brandon J Stoker
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Miguel Perez
Represented By: Heather Lynn Richardson
Represented By: Blaine H Evanson
Represented By: Dhananjay S Manthripragada
Represented By: Theano Evangelis Kapur
Represented By: Joshua S Lipshutz
Represented By: Brandon J Stoker
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Uber Technologies, Inc.
Represented By: Heather Lynn Richardson
Represented By: Blaine H Evanson
Represented By: Dhananjay S Manthripragada
Represented By: Theano Evangelis Kapur
Represented By: Joshua S Lipshutz
Represented By: Brandon J Stoker
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Lydia Olson
Represented By: Heather Lynn Richardson
Represented By: Blaine H Evanson
Represented By: Dhananjay S Manthripragada
Represented By: Theano Evangelis Kapur
Represented By: Joshua S Lipshutz
Represented By: Brandon J Stoker
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?