United States of America v. Reddi-Wip, Inc.

Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: Reddi-Wip, Inc.
Case Number: 2:2019mc00135
Filed: June 20, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Virginia A Phillips
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Jury Demanded By: None

Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on June 20, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
June 20, 2019 Filing 1 MOTION TO TERMINATE LEGACY ANTITRUST JUDGMENT No Fee Required - US Government, filed by Plaintiff United States of America. (Attachments: #1 Appendix A, #2 Declaration, #3 Proposed Order) (Attorney Albert Bilog Sambat added to party United States of America(pty:pla))(Sambat, Albert)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: United States of America v. Reddi-Wip, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Reddi-Wip, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: United States of America
Represented By: Albert Bilog Sambat
Represented By: Katrina Hunt Rouse
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?