Thomas W. McNamara v. Francis Lee et al
| Thomas W. McNamara |
| Jacqueline Rodriguez and Francis Lee |
| 2:2019mc00176 |
| September 23, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 16, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 NOTICE of New Case Number and Judge Assignment by Clerk. This case is hereby converted from case type MC to case type CV because subsequent filings have changed the nature of the case. A new case number has therefore been assigned to this case. District Judge Virginia A. Phillips is assigned to this new case number 2:19-cv-08904-VAP. All future documents must be filed under this new case number. The previous case number, 2:19-mc-00176-UA, is hereby terminated. (car) |
| Filing 3 REQUEST for Order for For Service of Process by Registered Process Server filed by attorney for plaintiff Thomas W. McNamara. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order For service of process by registered process server) (Blanda, Jon) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE OF LODGING filed re MISC - Registration of Judgment from Another District (AO-451) #1 (Blanda, Jon) |
| Filing 1 REGISTRATION OF JUDGMENT FROM ANOTHER DISTRICT Receipt No: 0973-24485228 - Fee: $47, filed by attorney for plaintiff Thomas W. McNamara. (Attorney Jon O Blanda added to party Thomas W. McNamara(pty:pla))(Blanda, Jon) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
