Lauren Paffrath v. The Lampo Group, LLC
Plaintiff: Lauren Paffrath
Defendant: The Lampo Group, LLC
Case Number: 2:2019mc00193
Filed: November 25, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Cormac J Carney
Referring Judge: Michael R Wilner
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on December 23, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 25, 2019 Filing 6 APPLICATION for Hearing Hearing on Application for Order Shortening Time for Hearing on Motion to Quash Deposition Subpoena and Request for Sanctions and Hearing on Motion to Quash Deposition Subpoena, re Application/Motion/Request (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #2 , MISC - Other Miscellaneous Case,, #3 , filed by Plaintiff Lauren Paffrath. Application set for hearing on 12/18/2019 at 08:30 AM before Magistrate Judge Michael R. Wilner. (Smith, Kathleen)
November 25, 2019 Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Cormac J. Carney and Magistrate Judge Michael R. Wilner. (esa)
November 25, 2019 Filing 4 NOTICE of New Case Number and Judge Assignment by Clerk. This case is hereby converted from case type CV to case type MC because the incorrect case type was used at case opening. A new case number has therefore been assigned to this case. District Judge Cormac J. Carney and Magistrate Judge Michael R. Wilner are assigned to this new case number. All future documents must be filed under the new case number, which is 2:19-mc-00193 CJC (MRWx). The previous case number, 2:19-cv-10058, is hereby terminated. (esa)
November 25, 2019 Filing 3 Notice of Motion and Motion to Quash Subpoena and Sanctions with filing fee previously paid (47.00 paid on 11/25/2019, receipt number 26LO44TR), filed by Lauren Paffrath Lauren Paffrath. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 to Motion to Quash & Sanctions, #2 Exhibit 2 to Motion to Quash & Sanctions, #3 Exhibit 3 to Motion to Quash & Sanctions, #4 Exhibit 4 to Motion to Quash & Sanctions, #5 Declaration of Kathleen J. Smith to Motion to Quash & Sanctions, #6 Declaration Laura Paffrath to Motion to Quash & Sanctions, #7 Proposed Order to Motion to Quash & Sanctions, #8 Proposed Order to Application for Order Shortening Time)(Smith, Kathleen)
November 25, 2019 Filing 2 APPLICATION for Order Shortening Time for Hearing on Motion to Quash Deposition Subpoena with filing fee previously paid (47.00 paid on 11/25/2019, receipt number 26LO44TR), filed by Lauren Paffrath Lauren Paffrath. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Smith, Kathleen)
November 25, 2019 Filing 1 Notice of Interested Parties Receipt No: 0973-24842652 - Fee: $47, filed by Plaintiff Lauren Paffrath. (Attorney Kathleen Janetatos Smith, Smith added to party Lauren Paffrath(pty:bkmov))(Smith, Kathleen)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Lauren Paffrath v. The Lampo Group, LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: The Lampo Group, LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Lauren Paffrath
Represented By: Kathleen Janetatos Smith, Smith
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?