Dasan Trading, Co., Ltd. v. Va Va Voom et al
| Dasan Trading, Co., Ltd. |
| Dese Enterprise, Inc., DOES 1 through 50, inclusive and Va Va Voom |
| 2:2020cv00150 |
| January 6, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| John A Kronstadt |
| Alicia G Rosenberg |
| Copyright |
| 17 U.S.C. § 101 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 10, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 24 NOTICE OF DISMISSAL filed by Plaintiff Dasan Trading, Co., Ltd. pursuant to FRCP 41a(1) as to Dese Enterprise, Inc.. (Chang, Hyunsuk) |
Filing 23
(IN CHAMBERS) ORDER SETTING ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE DISMISSAL AS TO DESE ENTERPRISE, INC. (DKT. #22 ) by Judge John A. Kronstadt: On May 6, 2020, a notice of settlement was filed stating that a settlement has been reached between Plaintiff and Defendant Dese Enterprise, Inc. ("Dese"). The Court sets an Order to Show Cause re Dismissal for June 22, 2020. If a dismissal is not filed by June 22, 2020, counsel shall file a response to the Order to Show Cause, which includes the status of the settlement and the anticipated date the dismissal will be filed. The response shall not include any substantive contents of any settlement discussions between the parties. In light of the foregoing, all dates and deadlines are vacated as to Dese only. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (cw) TEXT ONLY ENTRY
|
| Filing 22 NOTICE of Settlement as to Defendant Dese Enterprise, Inc. filed by Plaintiff Dasan Trading, Co., Ltd.. (Chang, Hyunsuk) |
|
Filing 21
(IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE DISMISSAL FOR LACK OF PROSECUTION AS TO DEFENDANT DESE ENTERPRISE, INC. (DKT. #20 ) by Judge John A. Kronstadt: The Court, on its own motion, orders Plaintiff to show cause in writing no later than May 7, 2020, why this action should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution as to this Defendant. Pursuant to Rule 55 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Plaintiff shall file an application requesting the entry of default. Plaintiff is advised that the Court will consider the filing of an application, which complies with the federal rules, on or before the date upon which the response is due, as a satisfactory response to the Order to Show Cause. The Order to Show Cause will stand submitted upon the filing of an appropriate response. No oral argument will be heard unless otherwise ordered by the Court. Failure to respond will result in the dismissal of this matter. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (cw) TEXT ONLY ENTRY
|
| Filing 20 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Dasan Trading, Co., Ltd., upon Defendant Dese Enterprise, Inc. served on 2/27/2020, answer due 3/19/2020. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon George Lam, General Manager in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by service on a domestic corporation, unincorporated association, or public entity.Original Summons NOT returned. (Chang, Hyunsuk) |
|
Filing 19
ORDER STRIKING SERVICE UNDER FRCP 5(b)(2)(D) by Judge John A. Kronstadt. The document is stricken for the following reasons: Pursuant to the Notice of Deficiency #18 , the service was not effected through the Clerk's Office. Additionally, the dates of service and response are incorrect in the docket text. Counsel are directed to file correctly no later than 5/1/2020. (cw)
|
| Filing 18 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Documents RE: Service of Summons and Complaint Returned Executed (21 days) #17 . The following error(s) was/were found: Incorrect statute prompt of FRCP 5(b)(2)(D) selected. Service was NOT made on the Clerks Office of United States District Court. In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (jp) |
| Filing 17 **STRICKEN** SERVICE UNDER FRCP 5(b)(2)(D) Executed by Plaintiff Dasan Trading, Co., Ltd., upon Defendant Dese Enterprise, Inc. served on 2/18/2020, answer due 3/10/2020. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon the Clerks Office in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (Chang, Hyunsuk) Modified on 4/29/2020 (cw). |
|
Filing 16
(IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE DISMISSAL FOR LACK OF PROSECUTION RE DEFENDANT DESE ENTERPRISE, INC. by Judge John A. Kronstadt: The Court, on its own motion, orders Plaintiff to show cause in writing no later than April 29, 2020, why this action should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution as to Defendant Dese Enterprise, Inc. In the absence of showing good cause, an action shall be dismissed if the summons and complaint have not been served within 90 days after the filing of the complaint pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(m). An action may be dismissed prior to such time if the Plaintiff fails diligently to prosecute the action. The Order to Show Cause will stand submitted upon the filing of an appropriate response. No oral argument will be heard unless otherwise ordered by the Court. Plaintiff is advised that the Court will consider the filing of a responsive pleading to the complaint and/or proof(s) of service, which indicates proper service in full compliance with the federal rules, on or before the date upon which the response is due, as a satisfactory response to the Order to Show Cause. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (cw) TEXT ONLY ENTRY
|
|
Filing 15
(IN CHAMBERS) ORDER SETTING HEARING ON PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT AS TO DEFENDANT VA VA VOOM by Judge John A. Kronstadt: On April 21, 2020, default was entered against Defendant Va Va Voom (Dkt. #14 ). The Court sets the hearing on the motion for default judgment for August 31, 2020 at 8:30 AM; the motion shall be served on Defendant and filed with the Court no later than July 27, 2020. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (cw) TEXT ONLY ENTRY
|
| Filing 14 DEFAULT BY CLERK F.R.Civ.P.55(a) as to Defendant Va Va Voom. (jp) |
| Filing 13 REQUEST for Clerk to Enter Default against Defendant Va Va Voom filed by Plaintiff Dasan Trading, Co., Ltd.. (Chang, Hyunsuk) |
| Filing 12 REQUEST for Clerk to Enter Default against Defendant Va Va Voom Dasan Trading, Co., Ltd. filed by Plaintiff Dasan Trading, Co., Ltd.. (Chang, Hyunsuk) |
|
Filing 11
IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE DISMISSAL FOR LACK OF PROSECUTION by Judge John A. Kronstadt: The Court, on its own motion, orders Plaintiff to show cause in writing no later than April 23, 2020, why this action should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. Pursuant to Rule 55 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Plaintiff shall file an application requesting the entry of default. Plaintiff is advised that the Court will consider the filing of an application, which complies with the federal rules, on or before the date upon which the response is due, as a satisfactory response to the Order to Show Cause. The Order to Show Cause will stand submitted upon the filing of an appropriate response. No oral argument will be heard unless otherwise ordered by the Court. Failure to respond will result in the dismissal of this matter. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (cw) TEXT ONLY ENTRY
|
| Filing 10 SERVICE UNDER FRCP 5(b)(2)(D) Executed by Plaintiff Dasan Trading, Co., Ltd., upon Defendant Va Va Voom served on 2/18/2020, answer due 3/10/2020. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon the Clerks Office in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (Chang, Hyunsuk) |
|
Filing 9
STANDING ORDERS FOR CIVIL CASES ASSIGNED TO JUDGE JOHN A. KRONSTADT upon filing of the complaint by Judge John A. Kronstadt. Please read each Order carefully as they differ in some respects from the Local Rules. Counsel are advised that the Court, at any time, may amend one or more of its Standing Orders. It is the responsibility of counsel to refer to this Court's Procedures and Schedules found on the website for the United States District Court, Central District of California (www.cacd.uscourts.gov) to obtain the operative order. The Court thanks the parties and their counsel for their anticipated cooperation in carrying out these requirements. (ake)
|
| Filing 8 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendants Dese Enterprise, Inc., Va Va Voom. (car) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (car) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge John A. Kronstadt and Magistrate Judge Alicia G. Rosenberg. (car) |
| Filing 5 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Dasan Trading, Co., Ltd.. (Chang, Hyunsuk) |
| Filing 4 REPORT ON THE FILING OF AN ACTION regarding a copyright (Initial Notification) filed by Dasan Trading, Co., Ltd.. (Chang, Hyunsuk) |
| Filing 3 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Dasan Trading, Co., Ltd.. (Chang, Hyunsuk) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Dasan Trading, Co., Ltd., (Chang, Hyunsuk) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: 0973-25068058 - Fee: $400, filed by Plaintiff Dasan Trading, Co., Ltd.. (Attorney Hyunsuk A Chang added to party Dasan Trading, Co., Ltd.(pty:pla))(Chang, Hyunsuk) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
