Douglas Charles Okun v. County of San Luis Obispo, et al
Plaintiff: Douglas Charles Okun
Defendant: County of San Luis Obispo, San Luis Obispo Probation Office, Arnold Nelson, James Salio, James Macias, Does I through X inclusive, Robert Macias and State of California
Case Number: 2:2020cv00178
Filed: January 7, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Percy Anderson
Referring Judge: Gail J Standish
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Other
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on April 12, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
February 19, 2020 Filing 23 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCIES in Request to Issue Summons RE: Summons Request #20 . The following error(s) was found: Summons request is moot due to 2nd amended complaint being stricken. The summons cannot be issued until this defect has been corrected. Please correct the defect and re-file your request. (mrgo)
February 18, 2020 Filing 22 RESPONSE BY THE COURT TO NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES IN ELECTRONICALLY FILED DOCUMENTS RE: Amended Complaint/Petition, #19 by Clerk of Court. The document is ordered stricken. A noticed motion is needed to file a second amended complaint. (mrgo)
February 12, 2020 Filing 21 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Documents RE: Amended Complaint/Petition, #19 . The following error(s) was/were found: Leave of court required for filing. In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (mrgo)
February 12, 2020 Filing 20 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Notice of Deficiency in Request to Issue Summons, #18 filed by plantiff Douglas Charles Okun. (Nickerson, Bruce)
February 10, 2020 Filing 19 [DOCUMENT STRICKEN PER DOC. NO. 22] SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT against Defendant County of San Luis Obispo, Does, James Macias, Robert Macias, James Salio, San Luis Obispo Probation Office amending Amended Complaint/Petition #11 , filed by Plaintiff Douglas Charles Okun(Nickerson, Bruce) Modified on 2/19/2020 (mrgo).
February 5, 2020 Filing 18 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCIES in Request to Issue Summons RE: Summons Request #17 . The following error(s) was found: Summons on First Amended Complaint issued on 2/3/2020. The summons cannot be issued until this defect has been corrected. Please correct the defect and re-file your request. (mrgo)
February 4, 2020 Filing 17 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Notice of Deficiency in Request to Issue Summons,, #14 filed by Plaintiff Douglas Charles Okun. (Nickerson, Bruce)
February 3, 2020 Filing 16 21 DAY Summons Issued re First Amended Complaint/Petition #11 as to defendants County of San Luis Obispo, Robert Macias, Arnold Nelson, James Salio, San Luis Obispo Probation Office. (mrgo)
February 1, 2020 Filing 15 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Notice of Deficiency in Request to Issue Summons,, #14 filed by Plaintiff Douglas Charles Okun. (Nickerson, Bruce)
January 31, 2020 Filing 14 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCIES in Request to Issue Summons RE: Summons Request #12 . The following error(s) was found: The caption of the summons must match the caption of the complaint verbatim. If the caption is too large to fit in the space provided, enter the name of the first party and then write "see attached."Next, attach a face page of the complaint or a second page addendum to the Summons. The summons cannot be issued until this defect has been corrected. Please correct the defect and re-file your request. (mrgo)
January 30, 2020 Filing 13 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Douglas Charles Okun, (Nickerson, Bruce)
January 30, 2020 Filing 12 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Summons Issued (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #10 filed by Plaintiff Douglas Charles Okun. (Nickerson, Bruce)
January 30, 2020 Filing 11 FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT against Defendant All Defendants amending Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #6 , filed by Plaintiff Douglas Charles Okun(Nickerson, Bruce)
January 13, 2020 Filing 10 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 as to defendants County of San Luis Obispo, James Macias, Arnold Nelson, James Salio, San Luis Obispo Probation Office. (mrgo)
January 10, 2020 Filing 9 NOTICE Notice of Interested Parties filed by Paintiff Douglas Charles Okun. Nickerson, Bruce (Nickerson, Bruce)
January 10, 2020 Filing 8 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Deficiency in Attorney Case Opening - optional html form, #4 , Notice of Deficiency in Request to Issue Summons, #5 filed by Plaintiff Douglas Charles Okun. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet)(Nickerson, Bruce)
January 8, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 7 STANDING ORDER by Judge Percy Anderson. READ THIS ORDER CAREFULLY. IT CONTROLS THE CASE AND DIFFERS IN SOME RESPECTS FROM THE LOCAL RULES. (lom)
January 7, 2020 Filing 6 COMPLAINT with filing fee previously paid ($400.00 paid on 01/07/2020, receipt number 097325075051), filed by Plaintiff Douglas Charles Okun.(Nickerson, Bruce)
January 7, 2020 Filing 5 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCIES in Request to Issue Summons. The following error(s) was found: Summons is not directed to the defendant(s). The defendants name must appear in the To:section of the summons. The time to answer for federal governmental agencies is 60 days. All other parties must receive 21 days. Please prepare your summons on form AO 440 and refile your request. The summons cannot be issued until this defect has been corrected. Please correct the defect and re-file your request. (esa)
January 7, 2020 Filing 4 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCIES in Attorney Case Opening. The following error(s) was found: Other error(s) with document(s): Civil Cover Sheet, Request for Summons and Notice of Interested Parties are attached to the Complaint. Each of these documents should have been filed and entered separately under its correct event/relief. Form CV71 should have been completed for the Civil Cover Sheet. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (esa)
January 7, 2020 Filing 3 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (esa)
January 7, 2020 Filing 2 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Percy Anderson and Magistrate Judge Gail J. Standish. (esa)
January 7, 2020 Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: 0973-25075051 - Fee: $400, filed by PLAINTIFF Douglas Charles Okun. (Attachments: #1 Supplement Summons, #2 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Supplement List of Interested Parties) (Attorney Bruce W Nickerson added to party Douglas Charles Okun(pty:pla))(Nickerson, Bruce)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Douglas Charles Okun v. County of San Luis Obispo, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: County of San Luis Obispo
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: San Luis Obispo Probation Office
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Arnold Nelson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: James Salio
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: James Macias
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Does I through X inclusive
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Robert Macias
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: State of California
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Douglas Charles Okun
Represented By: Jeffrey R Stein
Represented By: Bruce W Nickerson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?