Carlos F. Miranda et al v. Ford Motor Company et al
| Debi R. Miranda and Carlos F. Miranda |
| Ford Motor Company, Galpin Motors, Inc. d/b/a Galpin Motors, Galpin Motors, Inc., Does 1 through 10, inclusive and Galpin Motors, Inc. doing business as Galpin Motors |
| 2:2020cv00237 |
| January 8, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Patrick J Walsh |
| John F Walter |
| Contract Product Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1441 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 25, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 20 TRANSMITTAL of documents to Los Angeles Superior Court, County of Los Angeles. A certified copy of the order of remand and a copy of the docket sheet from this court was sent to Los Angeles Superior Court, County of Los Angeles. (yl) |
Filing 19
MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS MOTION TO REMAND [filed 1/28/20; Docket No. #11 ] by Judge John F. Walter: For all the foregoing reasons, Plaintiffs Motion is GRANTED. This action is REMANDED to Los Angeles Superior Court for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. See 28 U.S.C. 1447(c). IT IS SO ORDERED. Remanding Case to State Court Case Remanded to Los Angeles Superior Court, case 19STCV43829. MD JS-6. Case Terminated. (yl)
|
| Filing 18 NOTICE OF LODGING filed re NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Remand Case to Los Angeles Superior Court #11 (Attachments: #1 Plaintiffs' Proposed Statement of Decision on Plaintiffs' Motion to Remand)(Aziz, Cinela) |
| Filing 17 NOTICE OF LODGING filed re. Defendants' Proposed Statement of Decision re Objection/Opposition (Motion related) #14 (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order Statement of Decision)(May, Richard) |
| Filing 16 REPLY in support NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Remand Case to Los Angeles Superior Court #11 filed by Plaintiffs Carlos F. Miranda, Debi R. Miranda. (Aziz, Cinela) |
| Filing 15 DECLARATION of RICHARD J. MAY IN OPPOSITION TO NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Remand Case to Los Angeles Superior Court #11 filed by Defendants Ford Motor Company, Galpin Motors, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E, #6 Exhibit F, #7 Exhibit G, #8 Exhibit H)(May, Richard) |
| Filing 14 OPPOSITION IN OPPOSITION TO re: NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Remand Case to Los Angeles Superior Court #11 filed by Defendants Ford Motor Company, Galpin Motors, Inc.. (May, Richard) |
|
Filing 13
SCHEDULING AND CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER by Judge John F. Walter. The purpose of this Order is to notify the parties and their counsel of the deadlines and the schedule that will govern this action. Pretrial Conference set for 10/30/2020 at 8:00 AM. Hearing on Motions in Limine; Disputed Jury Instructions set for 11/6/2020 at 8:00 AM. Jury Trial set for 11/10/2020 at 8:30 AM. SEE ORDER FOR DETAILS. (iv)
|
|
Filing 12
ORDER VACATING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE, REFERRAL TO PRIVATE MEDIATION, and DISMISSING ANY UNSERVED DOE DEFENDANTS by Judge John F. Walter. The Court has reviewed the parties' Joint Rule 26(f) Report and finds that a Scheduling Conference is not necessary. The hearing on February 10, 2020 is vacated and taken off calendar. A Scheduling and Case Management Order will issue. Any unserved DOE defendants are dismissed at this time. The Court, having considered the parties' Request: ADR Procedure Selection, the Notice to Parties of Court-Directed ADR Program, or the report submitted by the parties pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(f) and Civil L.R. 26-1, hereby: ORDERS this case referred to: ADR PROCEDURE NO. 3: (Private mediation). The ADR proceeding is to be completed no later than: June 22, 2020. The Joint Report re: Results of Settlement Conference due on: June 26, 2020. (iv)
|
| Filing 11 NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Remand Case to Los Angeles Superior Court filed by Plaintiff Carlos F. Miranda, Debi R. Miranda. Motion set for hearing on 3/2/2020 at 01:30 PM before Judge John F. Walter. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Support of Motion to Remand, #2 Declaration of Cinela Aziz in Support of Plainitffs' Motion to Remand, #3 Exhibit 1 to Declaration, #4 Proposed Order Granting Plaintiff's Motion to Remand) (Aziz, Cinela) |
| Filing 10 JOINT REPORT Rule 26(f) Discovery Plan filed by Defendants Ford Motor Company, Galpin Motors, Inc... (May, Richard) |
| Filing 9 JOINT STATEMENT REGARDING MEET AND CONFER PRE-FILING CONFERENCE PURSUANT TO JUDGE JOHN F. WALTERS STANDING ORDER AND LOCAL RULE 7-3 re PLAINTIFFS MOTION TO REMAND REPORT of JOINT REPORT filed by Plaintiffs Carlos F. Miranda, Debi R. Miranda. (Aziz, Cinela) |
| Filing 8 Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel: for attorney Cinela Aziz counsel for Plaintiffs Carlos F. Miranda, Debi R. Miranda. Adding Cinela Aziz as counsel of record for Carlos F. Miranda et al for the reason indicated in the G-123 Notice. Filed by Plaintiff Carlos and Debi Miranda. (Attorney Cinela Aziz added to party Carlos F. Miranda(pty:pla), Attorney Cinela Aziz added to party Debi R. Miranda(pty:pla))(Aziz, Cinela) |
|
Filing 7
MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS by Judge John F. Walter: Counsel are hereby notified that a Scheduling Conference has been set for February 10, 2020 at 1:15 p.m. before Judge John F. Walter in Courtroom 7A, 350 W. 1st St, Los Angeles, CA 90012. Lead Trial Counsel shall attend all proceedings before this Court, including the Scheduling Conference. Counsel are directed to comply with Rule 26 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 26-1 in a timely fashion and to file a Joint Report, on or before January 27, 2020. (iv)
|
|
Filing 6
STANDING ORDER by Judge John F. Walter. READ THIS ORDER CAREFULLY. IT CONTROLS THE CASE AND DIFFERS IN SOME RESPECTS FROM THE LOCAL RULES. This action has been assigned to the calendar of Judge John F. Walter. (iv)
|
| Filing 5 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (esa) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge John F. Walter and Magistrate Judge Patrick J. Walsh. (esa) |
| CONFORMED COPY OF COMPLAINT against defendants Does, Ford Motor Company, Galpin Motors, Inc., Jury Demand, filed by plaintiffs Carlos F. Miranda, Debi R. Miranda. (filed in state court 12/4/19, submitted as document 1, attachment 2, p. 4) (esa) |
| COPY OF SERVICE OF PROCESS TRANSMITTAL executed by Plaintiffs Carlos F. Miranda, Debi R. Miranda, upon Defendant Ford Motor Company served on 12/9/2019. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon CT Corporation System, Agent for Process of Service by service on a domestic corporation, unincorporated association, or public entity. Original Summons NOT returned. (non-conformed, submitted as document 1, attachment 2, p. 2) (esa) |
| CONFORMED COPY OF ANSWER to Complaint filed by defendant Galpin Motors, Inc. (filed in state court 1/8/20, submitted as document 1, attachment 2, p. 41)(esa) |
| CONFORMED COPY OF ANSWER to Complaint filed by defendant Ford Motor Company. (filed in state court 1/8/20, submitted as document 1, attachment 2, p. 28)(esa) |
| Filing 3 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Ford Motor Company, identifying State Street Corporation; Evercore Trust Company, N.A.; Black Rock, Inc.; and The Vanguard Group; China-Jiangling Motors Corporation, Limited; Turkey-Ford Otomotiv Anonim Sirketi (Ford Otosan); Ford Motor Credit Company LLC; Ford Credit Canada Company; Ford Credit de Mexico S.A., de C.V. Sociedad Financiera de Objeto Multiple, E.R.; Ford Holdings LLC; FCE Bank plc; Ford Automotive Finance (China) Limited; and Banco Ford S.A.. (May, Richard) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendants Ford Motor Company, Galpin Motors, Inc. d/b/a Galpin Motors. (May, Richard) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Los Angeles, case number 19STCV43829 Receipt No: 0973-25086962 - Fee: $400, filed by Defendants Galpin Motors, Inc. d/b/a Galpin Motors, Ford Motor Company. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Declaration) (Attorney Richard J May added to party Ford Motor Company(pty:dft), Attorney Richard J May added to party Galpin Motors, Inc. d/b/a Galpin Motors(pty:dft))(May, Richard) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
