Carlos F. Miranda et al v. Ford Motor Company et al
Debi R. Miranda and Carlos F. Miranda |
Ford Motor Company, Galpin Motors, Inc. d/b/a Galpin Motors, Galpin Motors, Inc., Does 1 through 10, inclusive and Galpin Motors, Inc. doing business as Galpin Motors |
2:2020cv00237 |
January 8, 2020 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Patrick J Walsh |
John F Walter |
Contract Product Liability |
28 U.S.C. § 1441 |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 25, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 20 TRANSMITTAL of documents to Los Angeles Superior Court, County of Los Angeles. A certified copy of the order of remand and a copy of the docket sheet from this court was sent to Los Angeles Superior Court, County of Los Angeles. (yl) |
|
Filing 18 NOTICE OF LODGING filed re NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Remand Case to Los Angeles Superior Court #11 (Attachments: #1 Plaintiffs' Proposed Statement of Decision on Plaintiffs' Motion to Remand)(Aziz, Cinela) |
Filing 17 NOTICE OF LODGING filed re. Defendants' Proposed Statement of Decision re Objection/Opposition (Motion related) #14 (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order Statement of Decision)(May, Richard) |
Filing 16 REPLY in support NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Remand Case to Los Angeles Superior Court #11 filed by Plaintiffs Carlos F. Miranda, Debi R. Miranda. (Aziz, Cinela) |
Filing 15 DECLARATION of RICHARD J. MAY IN OPPOSITION TO NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Remand Case to Los Angeles Superior Court #11 filed by Defendants Ford Motor Company, Galpin Motors, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E, #6 Exhibit F, #7 Exhibit G, #8 Exhibit H)(May, Richard) |
Filing 14 OPPOSITION IN OPPOSITION TO re: NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Remand Case to Los Angeles Superior Court #11 filed by Defendants Ford Motor Company, Galpin Motors, Inc.. (May, Richard) |
|
|
Filing 11 NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Remand Case to Los Angeles Superior Court filed by Plaintiff Carlos F. Miranda, Debi R. Miranda. Motion set for hearing on 3/2/2020 at 01:30 PM before Judge John F. Walter. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Support of Motion to Remand, #2 Declaration of Cinela Aziz in Support of Plainitffs' Motion to Remand, #3 Exhibit 1 to Declaration, #4 Proposed Order Granting Plaintiff's Motion to Remand) (Aziz, Cinela) |
Filing 10 JOINT REPORT Rule 26(f) Discovery Plan filed by Defendants Ford Motor Company, Galpin Motors, Inc... (May, Richard) |
Filing 9 JOINT STATEMENT REGARDING MEET AND CONFER PRE-FILING CONFERENCE PURSUANT TO JUDGE JOHN F. WALTERS STANDING ORDER AND LOCAL RULE 7-3 re PLAINTIFFS MOTION TO REMAND REPORT of JOINT REPORT filed by Plaintiffs Carlos F. Miranda, Debi R. Miranda. (Aziz, Cinela) |
Filing 8 Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel: for attorney Cinela Aziz counsel for Plaintiffs Carlos F. Miranda, Debi R. Miranda. Adding Cinela Aziz as counsel of record for Carlos F. Miranda et al for the reason indicated in the G-123 Notice. Filed by Plaintiff Carlos and Debi Miranda. (Attorney Cinela Aziz added to party Carlos F. Miranda(pty:pla), Attorney Cinela Aziz added to party Debi R. Miranda(pty:pla))(Aziz, Cinela) |
|
|
Filing 5 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (esa) |
Filing 4 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge John F. Walter and Magistrate Judge Patrick J. Walsh. (esa) |
CONFORMED COPY OF COMPLAINT against defendants Does, Ford Motor Company, Galpin Motors, Inc., Jury Demand, filed by plaintiffs Carlos F. Miranda, Debi R. Miranda. (filed in state court 12/4/19, submitted as document 1, attachment 2, p. 4) (esa) |
COPY OF SERVICE OF PROCESS TRANSMITTAL executed by Plaintiffs Carlos F. Miranda, Debi R. Miranda, upon Defendant Ford Motor Company served on 12/9/2019. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon CT Corporation System, Agent for Process of Service by service on a domestic corporation, unincorporated association, or public entity. Original Summons NOT returned. (non-conformed, submitted as document 1, attachment 2, p. 2) (esa) |
CONFORMED COPY OF ANSWER to Complaint filed by defendant Galpin Motors, Inc. (filed in state court 1/8/20, submitted as document 1, attachment 2, p. 41)(esa) |
CONFORMED COPY OF ANSWER to Complaint filed by defendant Ford Motor Company. (filed in state court 1/8/20, submitted as document 1, attachment 2, p. 28)(esa) |
Filing 3 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Ford Motor Company, identifying State Street Corporation; Evercore Trust Company, N.A.; Black Rock, Inc.; and The Vanguard Group; China-Jiangling Motors Corporation, Limited; Turkey-Ford Otomotiv Anonim Sirketi (Ford Otosan); Ford Motor Credit Company LLC; Ford Credit Canada Company; Ford Credit de Mexico S.A., de C.V. Sociedad Financiera de Objeto Multiple, E.R.; Ford Holdings LLC; FCE Bank plc; Ford Automotive Finance (China) Limited; and Banco Ford S.A.. (May, Richard) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendants Ford Motor Company, Galpin Motors, Inc. d/b/a Galpin Motors. (May, Richard) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Los Angeles, case number 19STCV43829 Receipt No: 0973-25086962 - Fee: $400, filed by Defendants Galpin Motors, Inc. d/b/a Galpin Motors, Ford Motor Company. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Declaration) (Attorney Richard J May added to party Ford Motor Company(pty:dft), Attorney Richard J May added to party Galpin Motors, Inc. d/b/a Galpin Motors(pty:dft))(May, Richard) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.