ComedyMX LLC v. Broadbandtv Corp., et al
COMEDYMX LLC |
BROADBANDTV CORP. and CINEDIGM DIGITAL CINEMA CORP. |
2:2020cv00260 |
January 9, 2020 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Jean P Rosenbluth |
Stephen V Wilson |
Copyright |
17 U.S.C. ยง 501 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 24, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 19 IN CHAMBERS ORDER-TEXT ONLY ENTRY by Judge Stephen V. Wilson: The Order to Show Cause #16 , issued on 02/18/2020, is DISCHARGED. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (pc) TEXT ONLY ENTRY |
Filing 18 RESPONSE filed by Plaintiff ComedyMX LLCto Minutes of In Chambers Order/Directive - no proceeding held, Set/Reset Deadlines #16 (Lila, Ben) |
Filing 17 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed filed by plaintiff ComedyMX LLC. upon Cinedigm Digital Cinema Corp. waiver sent by Plaintiff on 1/10/2020, answer due 3/10/2020. Waiver of Service signed by Jonathan Cooperman. (Lila, Ben) |
Filing 16 MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS - ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THIS CASE SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR LACK OF PROSECUTION by Judge Stephen V. Wilson. (Show Cause Response due by 2/25/2020.) (mrgo) |
Filing 15 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed filed by plaintiff ComedyMX LLC. upon Broadbandtv Corp. waiver sent by Plaintiff on 1/10/2020, answer due 4/9/2020. Waiver of Service signed by Josephine Brosas. (Lila, Ben) |
Filing 14 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff ComedyMX LLC, upon Defendant Cinedigm Digital Cinema Corp. served on 1/21/2020, answer due 2/11/2020. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Melody Cade, agent in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by personal service.Original Summons NOT returned. (Lila, Ben) |
Filing 13 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff ComedyMX LLC, upon Defendant Broadbandtv Corp. served on 1/15/2020, answer due 2/5/2020. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Mai Houa Yang, agent in compliance with California Code of Civil Procedure by personal service.Original Summons NOT returned. (Lila, Ben) |
Filing 12 NEW CASE ORDER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Stephen V. Wilson. (pc) |
Filing 11 RESPONSE filed by Plaintiff ComedyMX LLCto Notice To Counsel Re: Copyright/Patent/Trademark (CV-31) - optional html form #10 (Lila, Ben) |
Filing 10 NOTICE TO COUNSEL RE: Copyright, Patent and Trademark Reporting Requirements. Counsel shall file the appropriate AO-120 and/or AO-121 form with the Clerk within 10 days. (esa) |
Filing 9 21 DAY Summons issued re Complaint #1 as to defendant Cinedigm Digital Cinema Corp. (esa) |
Filing 8 21 DAY Summons issued re Complaint #1 as to defendant Broadbandtv Corp. (esa) |
Filing 7 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (esa) |
Filing 6 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Stephen V. Wilson and Magistrate Judge Jean P. Rosenbluth. (esa) |
Filing 5 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff COMEDYMX LLC, (Lila, Ben) |
Filing 4 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by plaintiff COMEDYMX LLC. (Lila, Ben) |
Filing 3 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by plaintiff COMEDYMX LLC. (Lila, Ben) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff COMEDYMX LLC. (Lila, Ben) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: 0973-25093508 - Fee: $400, filed by plaintiff COMEDYMX LLC. (Attorney Ben T Lila added to party COMEDYMX LLC(pty:pla))(Lila, Ben) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.