Verragio, Ltd. v. C. Gonshor Fine Jewelry
| Verragio, Ltd. |
| C. Gonshor Fine Jewelry |
| 2:2020cv00273 |
| January 9, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Dale S Fischer |
| Suzanne H Segal |
| Copyright |
| 17 U.S.C. ยง 501 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 12, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 11 STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to C. Gonshor Fine Jewelry answer now due 3/12/2020, filed by Defendant C. Gonshor Fine Jewelry.(Attorney Reid E Dammann added to party C. Gonshor Fine Jewelry(pty:dft))(Dammann, Reid) |
| Filing 10 SERVICE UNDER FRCP 5(b)(2)(D) Executed by Plaintiff Verragio, Ltd., upon Defendant C. Gonshor Fine Jewelry served on 1/22/2020, answer due 2/12/2020. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon the Clerks Office in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (Kroll, Howard) |
Filing 9
STANDING ORDER FOR CASES ASSIGNED TO JUDGE DALE S. FISCHER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Dale S. Fischer. If a party would be entitled to attorneys fees, counsel are referred to the Order Re Fees found on Court's website under Judge Fischer's Procedures and Schedules contained in the Judge's Requirements tab. Read all Orders carefully. They govern this case and differ in some respects from the Local Rules. COUNSEL ARE ORDERED TO PROVIDE A MANDATORY CHAMBERS COPY OF THE COMPLAINT, NOTICE OF REMOVAL, AND ANY OTHER INITIATING DOCUMENTS. (rfi)
|
| Filing 8 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant C. Gonshor Fine Jewelry. (ghap) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (ghap) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Dale S. Fischer and Magistrate Judge Suzanne H. Segal. (ghap) |
| Filing 5 REPORT ON THE FILING OF AN ACTION regarding a copyright (Initial Notification) filed by Verragio, Ltd.. (Kroll, Howard) |
| Filing 4 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Verragio, Ltd.. (Kroll, Howard) |
| Filing 3 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Verragio, Ltd., (Kroll, Howard) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Verragio, Ltd.. (Kroll, Howard) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: 0973-25094938 - Fee: $400, filed by Plaintiff Verragio, Ltd.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C) (Attorney Howard A Kroll added to party Verragio, Ltd.(pty:pla))(Kroll, Howard) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Verragio, Ltd. v. C. Gonshor Fine Jewelry | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Verragio, Ltd. | |
| Represented By: | Howard A Kroll |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: C. Gonshor Fine Jewelry | |
| Represented By: | Debra Ellwood Meppen |
| Represented By: | Reid E Dammann |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
