Michael Slosser v. Betty Johnson et al
| Michael Slosser |
| Betty Johnson and Does 1 to 10 |
| 2:2020cv00300 |
| January 10, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Western Division - Los Angeles Office |
| Patrick J Walsh |
| Otis D Wright |
| Rent Lease & Ejectment |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1443 (1) Notice of Removal - Rent, Lease & Ejectment |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 18, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 12 Receipt of remand by Los Angeles Superior Court on 1/22/20 (lc) |
| Filing 11 TRANSMITTAL of documents to Los Angeles County Superior Court. A certified copy of the order of remand and a copy of the docket sheet from this court was sent to Los Angeles County Superior Court No.19STUD1070 (lc) |
Filing 10
ORDER REMANDING CASE TO STATE COURT FOR LACK OF SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION by Judge Otis D. Wright, II: Case Remanded to Los Angeles County Superior Court, Case number 19STUD1070. Case Terminated. Made JS-6 (lc)
|
|
Filing 9
ORDER DENYING #3 REQUEST for Leave to Proceed in Forma Pauperis. Case remanded to State court by Judge Otis D. Wright, II (lc) Modified on 1/16/2020 (lc).
|
|
Filing 8
ORDER that the Scheduling Conference is set for 4/27/ 2020 1:30 PM ; compliance with FRCP 16, and 26(f) and filing of joint report; Counsel for plaintiff shall immediately serve this Order on all parties, including any new parties to the action by Judge Otis D Wright, II (lc)
|
|
Filing 7
SELF-REPRESENTATION ORDER by Judge Otis D. Wright, II (lc)
|
|
Filing 6
MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS by Judge Otis D Wright, II: This action has been assigned to the calendar of Judge Otis D. Wright II. Counsel are STRONGLY encouraged to review the Central Districts website for additional information. (SEE DOCUMENT FOR SPECIFIC FILING REQUIREMENTS AND INFORMATION. The parties may consent to proceed before a Magistrate Judge appearing on the voluntary consent list. PLEASE refer to Local Rule 79-5 for the submission of CIVIL ONLY SEALED DOCUMENTS. CRIMINAL SEALED DOCUMENTS will remain the same. all proposed sealed documents must be submitted via e-mail to the Judges Chambers email address, EXCLUDING those submitted by pro se parties and IN CAMERA filings, which shall continue to comply with Local Rule 79-5.1. Please refer to the Judges procedures and schedules for detailed instructions for submission of sealed documents. (lc)
|
| Filing 5 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (lh) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Otis D. Wright, II and Magistrate Judge Patrick J. Walsh. (lh) |
| Filing 3 APPLICATION to Proceed in District Court Without Prepaying Fees or Costs (Short Form) filed by Defendant Betty Johnson. (lh) |
| Filing 2 CERTIFICATION AND NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Betty Johnson, (lh) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles, case number 19STUD10709 with NON-CONFORMED copy of summons and complaint. Case assigned to Judge Otis D. Wright, II, Discovery to Magistrate Judge Patrick J. Walsh. Filed by Defendant Betty Johnson. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (lh) |
| CONFORMED FILED COPY OF ANSWER to Complaint, filed by Defendant Betty Johnson. (FILED IN LOS ANGELES COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT ON 12/10/2019 SUBMITTED ATTACHED TO NOTICE OF REMOVAL #1 )(lh) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
