Kathleen K. Johnson et al v. UBS AG
| Judith Woodard and Kathleen K Johnson |
| UBS AG |
| 2:2020cv00357 |
| January 13, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Jacqueline Chooljian |
| John A Kronstadt |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 13, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 9
STANDING ORDERS FOR CIVIL CASES ASSIGNED TO JUDGE JOHN A. KRONSTADT upon filing of the complaint by Judge John A. Kronstadt. Please read each Order carefully as they differ in some respects from the Local Rules. Counsel are advised that the Court, at any time, may amend one or more of its Standing Orders. It is the responsibility of counsel to refer to this Court's Procedures and Schedules found on the website for the United States District Court, Central District of California (www.cacd.uscourts.gov) to obtain the operative order. The Court thanks the parties and their counsel for their anticipated cooperation in carrying out these requirements. (ake)
|
| Filing 8 NOTICE AND CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiffs All Plaintiffs, (Swearinger, William) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE OF PRO HAC VICE APPLICATION DUE for Non-Resident Attorney The Dweck Law Firm. A document recently filed in this case lists you as an out-of-state attorney of record. However, the Court has not been able to locate any record that you are admitted to the Bar of this Court, and you have not filed an application to appear Pro Hac Vice in this case. Accordingly, within 5 business days of the date of this notice, you must either (1) have your local counsel file an application to appear Pro Hac Vice (Form G-64) and pay the applicable fee, or (2) complete the next section of this form and return it to the court at cacd_attyadm@cacd.uscourts.gov. You have been removed as counsel of record from the docket in this case, and you will not be added back to the docket until your Pro Hac Vice status has been resolved. (esa) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCIES in Attorney Case Opening. The following error(s) was found: No Notice of Interested Parties has been filed. A Notice of Interested Parties must be filed with every partys first appearance. See Local Rule 7.1-1. Counsel must file a Notice of Interested Parties immediately. Failure to do so may be addressed by judicial action, including sanctions. See Local Rule 83-7. (esa) |
| Filing 5 21 DAY Summons issued re Complaint #1 as to defendant UBS AG. (esa) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (esa) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge John A. Kronstadt and Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Chooljian. (esa) |
| Filing 2 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Plaintiffs Kathleen K Johnson, Judith Woodard. (Swearinger, William) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: 0973-25112531 - Fee: $400, filed by Plaintiffs Kathleen K Johnson, Judith Woodard. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Civil Cover Sheet) (Attorney William F Swearinger added to party Kathleen K Johnson(pty:trust), Attorney William F Swearinger added to party Kathleen K Johnson(pty:pla), Attorney William F Swearinger added to party Judith Woodard(pty:pla), Attorney William F Swearinger added to party Judith Woodard(pty:trust))(Swearinger, William) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
