Christian Benitez v. D. Schumacher et al
| Christian Benitez |
| Lt. D. Schumacher, John Does, T. Lewandowski, Warden, C D W Johnson, Sgt. John Doe, J. Anderson and K Wolter |
| 2:2020cv00396 |
| January 14, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Shashi H Kewalramani |
| Fernando M Olguin |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 12, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 5
INITIAL CIVIL RIGHTS CASE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Shashi H. Kewalramani. (dc)
|
|
Filing 4
ORDER RE REQUEST TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS by Magistrate Judge Shashi H. Kewalramani: granting #2 REQUEST for Leave to Proceed in Forma Pauperis. (dc)
|
| Filing 3 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Fernando M. Olguin and referred to Magistrate Judge Shashi H. Kewalramani. (ghap) |
| Filing 2 APPLICATION to Proceed In District Court Without Prepaying Fees or Costs filed by plaintiff Christian Benitez. (ghap) |
| Filing 1 CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT filed against Defendants J. Anderson, John Doe, John Does, T. Lewandowski, D. Schumacher, C D W Johnson, Warden, K Wolter pursuant to 42:1983. Case assigned to Judge Fernando M. Olguin and referred to Magistrate Judge Shashi H. Kewalramani., filed by plaintiff Christian Benitez. (ghap) (Main Document 1 replaced on 1/15/2020) (ghap). (Additional attachment(s) added on 1/15/2020: #1 Summons) (ghap). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
