American Sentinel Insurance Company v. EGS Trucking, Inc. et al
| American Sentinel Insurance Company |
| EGS Trucking, Inc. and Navistar Inc |
| 2:2020cv00451 |
| January 16, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Ronald SW Lew |
| Suzanne H Segal |
| Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1332 |
| Defendant |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 25, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 19
MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS by Judge Ronald S.W. Lew: The above matter is set for a Scheduling Conference on May 5, 2020 at 10:00 A.M. The conference will be held pursuant to F.R.Civ.P. 16(b). The parties are reminded of their obligations to disclose information and confer on a discovery plan not later than 21 days priorto the scheduling conference and report to the Court not later than 14 days after they confer as required by F.R.Civ.P. 26 and the Local Rules of this Court. Failure to comply may lead to the imposition of sanctions. See order for further details. (shb)
|
| Filing 18 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Navistar Inc, identifying Navistar International Corporation, 2.TRATON SE, 3.Icahn Associates Holding LLC, 4.MHR Fund Management LLC. (Holm, Esther) |
| Filing 17 ANSWER to Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 with JURY DEMAND filed by Defendant Navistar Inc.(Attorney Esther P Holm added to party Navistar Inc(pty:dft))(Holm, Esther) |
|
Filing 16
MINUTE IN CHAMBERS - ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THIS CASE SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR LACK OF PROSECUTION by Judge Ronald S.W. Lew: The Court, on its own motion, hereby orders plaintiff /s to show cause in writing no later than March 13, 2020, why this action should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. As an alternative to a written response by plaintiff(s), the Court will accept one of the following, if it is filed on or before the above date, as evidence that the matter is being prosecuted diligently: Defendants Answer/Response to the Complaint/Plaintiffs Request for Entry of Default on defendant/s OR appropriate request for dismissal of this action. No oral argument of this matter will be heard unless ordered by the Court. The Order will stand submitted upon the filing of a responsive pleading or motion on or before the date upon which aresponse by plaintiffs is due. Plaintiff is to serve notice of this Order on all named parties in this action who have been served but have not yet appeared. (shb)
|
| Filing 15 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Defendant American Sentinel Insurance Company, upon Defendant Navistar Inc served on 2/7/2020, answer due 2/28/2020. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon CSC Lawyers, Authorized Agent in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by personal service.Original Summons returned. (Braun, Nathaniel) |
| Filing 14 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant EGS Trucking, Inc. (shb) |
| Filing 13 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant Navistar Inc. (shb) |
| Filing 12 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by plaintiff American Sentinel Insurance Company. (Braun, Nathaniel) |
| Filing 11 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by plaintiff American Sentinel Insurance Company. (Braun, Nathaniel) |
| Filing 10 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCIES in Request to Issue Summons RE: Summons Request #9 , Summons Request #8 . The following error(s) was found: The date and signature line must be left blank. The summons cannot be issued until this defect has been corrected. Please correct the defect and re-file your request. (shb) |
| Filing 9 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by plaintiff American Sentinel Insurance Company. (Braun, Nathaniel) |
| Filing 8 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by plaintiff American Sentinel Insurance Company. (Braun, Nathaniel) |
| Filing 7 RESPONSE filed by Pro Hac Vice attorney Kirsten Soto on behalf of Plaintiff American Sentinel Insurance Company. RE: Notice of Filing Fee Due. PHV fee N/A. Attorney will not be appearing as attorney of record on this case.(lt) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE OF PRO HAC VICE APPLICATION DUE for Non-Resident Attorney Kirsten Soto. A document recently filed in this case lists you as an out-of-state attorney of record. However, the Court has not been able to locate any record that you are admitted to the Bar of this Court, and you have not filed an application to appear Pro Hac Vice in this case. Accordingly, within 5 business days of the date of this notice, you must either (1) have your local counsel file an application to appear Pro Hac Vice (Form G-64) and pay the applicable fee, or (2) complete the next section of this form and return it to the court at cacd_attyadm@cacd.uscourts.gov. You have been removed as counsel of record from the docket in this case, and you will not be added back to the docket until your Pro Hac Vice status has been resolved. (jtil) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (jtil) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Ronald S. W. Lew and Magistrate Judge Suzanne H. Segal. (jtil) |
| Filing 3 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by plaintiff American Sentinel Insurance Company, (Braun, Nathaniel) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff American Sentinel Insurance Company. (Braun, Nathaniel) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: 0973-25133125 - Fee: $400, filed by plaintiff American Sentinel Insurance Company. (Attorney Nathaniel S G Braun added to party American Sentinel Insurance Company(pty:pla))(Braun, Nathaniel) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
